Jump to content

User talk:176.88.82.7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please stop

[edit]

I understand you are trying to be helpful, but please stop editing that nomination page. You have now struck out my comments, as well as erased my comments. If you do not stop doing this, I will request that you be blocked. Steel1943 (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Steel, I'm just checking all upcoming films. I don't think that your block request will be accepted, and some of the nominations in the section are my ones. 176.88.82.7 (talk) 18:40, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you have now violated the hell out of WP:TPO, majorly failed to to WP:BEFORE as you didn't check neither for the validity of the "upcoming" status of the targets nor bypassed any incoming links prior to nominating the redirects, haven't tagged ANY of the redirects you nominated, and have f'ed up my nomination by all of this. Again, I know you are trying to be helpful, but back off. I now have to validate all of your nominations by using Twinkle to tag them, make sure the section redirects are included, and the redirects' creators are notified. Steel1943 (talk) 18:44, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop. Edits like this are disruptive. Please see Wikipedia:Disruptive editing for why this is a problem. Please stop making nominations at this time. --Super Goku V (talk) 19:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I said "nothing is disruptive" against others. 176.88.82.7 (talk) 19:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Part of the problem is that you are rapidly nominating multiple redirects at a time. Another part of the problem is that you are editing other's comments. A third part of the problem is that the nominations that you are proposing is not following all of the steps at WP:RFDHOWTO. Editors who created the redirects need to be informed that their redirects are up for deletion and the redirects themselves need to be edited to say that they are up for deletion. --Super Goku V (talk) 19:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Since it seems like you have stopped, let me suggest that for the future, you make a list of redirects that need to be discussed and then bring it up at Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion to see if someone wants to make the appropriate discussions. If someone suggests an idea, then follow their suggestion instead of mine. --Super Goku V (talk) 19:46, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have multiple questions. 1: What will happen if a discussion was closed by a user who is now blocked? 2: If a sysop or discussion closer is a cock of another user, what will be happened? 176.88.82.7 (talk) 19:49, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For the first point, it would say closed unless there was an issue with the closing. For the second point, could you rephrase the question? The meaning isn't clear. --Super Goku V (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For cock, I used C instead of S to not confuse socks and cocks. The same also happened to sockpuppet and cock puppet, where they are one of them. 1. Sock is a cloth worn on feet where cock is short for cock puppet. 2. Sockpuppet is a puppet made from socks where cock puppet is an alternate account of another blocked user. 176.88.82.7 (talk) 20:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. So, the discussion would stay closed unless there was an issue with the closing. (Not sure how this helps with the redirects.) --Super Goku V (talk) 20:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If there is an issue with the closing, will the discussion open again or what you will do? 176.88.82.7 (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion would need to be brought up to be reopened. --Super Goku V (talk) 21:09, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And how to tag redirects? Steel said "redirects are not tagged". 176.88.82.7 (talk) 04:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest that you create an account and edit about 10 times (constructively) so you can access Twinkle which will allow you to nominate redirects and will automatically tag the redirects while nominating the redirect. Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 18:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Please see WP:RFDHOWTO for the instructions for all steps necessary when nominating a redirect. Either way though, I got those redirects tagged since I want them gone as well, but I really don't want to have to do that again solely due to incomplete nominations by another editor. Steel1943 (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If I already created an account and that account constructively made 10 edits, then I had to try Twinkle and other Wikipedia programs. Even if so, all Vandalisms and disruptives will be reverted much faster, where a Vandalism is an edit made by a Vandal and Vandal-only account, and disruptives is short for disruptive edits. 176.88.82.7 (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
...What? Steel1943 (talk) 01:15, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:176.88.82.7&oldid=1142547360"