User talk:175.156.32.122

edit war

Whilst you are not yet inn one, I get the impression you soon might be, and you will end up with a block.Slatersteven (talk) 14:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

How come label Infowars as far right is whitewash? 175.156.32.122 (talk)

Your edit also removed that they're a conspiracy theory and fake news site. Replacing true information that would upset InfoWars's fans with information more pleasing to its fans falls under Whitewashing (censorship). Ian.thomson (talk) 14:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

• Reverted again. Take it to the Talk page or you will be blocked. Guy (Help!) 14:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Check out my reply on the infowars talk page.175.156.32.122 (talk)

May 2018

Your recent editing history at InfoWars shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Guy (Help!) 18:55, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

---