User talk:174.231.144.119

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

174.231.144.119 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why am I even blocked? Some guy accused me Of being some other guy and I am just blocked? What the heck?

Decline reason:

Obvious socks are obvious, and you clearly have no further need for talk page access. Favonian (talk) 19:38, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WP:DNFT

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

You are not welcome here because you are evading your block. Arcandam (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep saying it? I am not even this guy you claim. Does a negative comment make the way you treat me okay? 174.231.144.119 (talk) 19:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How stupid do you think we are? Arcandam (talk) 19:06, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not stupid, but unwelcoming and confused. 174.231.144.119 (talk) 19:07, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you don't think we are stupid, please try a bit harder if you want to fool us next time. Thanks in advance, Arcandam (talk) 19:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I ask you to stay off here if you are not polite, as I am to you. No one tried to fool Wikipedia. You make a mistake. 174.231.144.119 (talk) 19:10, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't been polite to me, insulting my mom isn't very polite. Now you are blocked. Have a nice day! Arcandam (talk) 19:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would always defend that hot stuff 174.231.144.119 (talk) 19:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on trolling, we will keep blocking you. Arcandam (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you do the more trolling here. The admins are not stupid and will unblock when they see your mistake. I already forgive you. 174.231.144.119 (talk) 19:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Admins are not stupid, that is the reason why you are blocked. Look, we are trying to make an encyclopedia here. You are here to disrupt, editwar and troll. That is why you are not welcome here. Arcandam (talk) 19:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this is why I come too. One comment and then you say I am this guy and blocked. That is not how encyclopedia is built. (Personal attack removed) 174.231.144.119 (talk) 19:21, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should've improved the encyclopedia instead of trolling, editwarring and being disruptive. The fact you keep making personal attacks proves my point. Arcandam (talk) 19:26, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to ask an admin to block you from editing this talkpage? Arcandam (talk) 19:35, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.