User talk:174.106.68.176

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Lindsay Price. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 09:24, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Apprentice (U.S. season 4) with your recent edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ZamorakO o (talk) 02:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Real Housewives of New Jersey edits that you made Why did you delete and remove content from the article? Also I noticed that what you added was what appears to be professional promotional content which makes certain characters appear in a positive light which may not be what readers are looking-for? If there is going to be a category of recurring characters, why would you delete "cousin Rosie"? And leave Granatell? You also deleted an episode preview and title which was sourced properly. Too many too mention, again I have to ask why? I am watching this page so please do not delete like this. Claudine is Dina's name. Ashlee may not be Ashley/Ashley's legal name so it does not need to be changed throughout the article. I don't know if Kathie was born in 1951 or not, that seems a little old it probably needs a reference but I am not changing your adds so please do not change other people's unless you have proof that it is a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.29.229 (talk) 17:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please do not convert people's last names to use their first names in Wikipedia articls as you did in 16 and Pregnant. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a fansite and treats living people respectfully and professionally by using last names and not impying an overfamiliarity by using first names. See the manual of style. Active Banana (^bananaphone 21:09, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to The Apprentice (U.S. season 5), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Puffin ^{Lets talk!} 19:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Challenge (TV series), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ‡ MAHEWA ‡ • talk 04:37, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You removed content from Wikipedia with this edit and this edit of to Coral Smith, but without providing a rationale for this in an Edit Summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. The passage in question does not pertain to Smith's time on The Real World, and therefore, does not belong in a section devoted to that part of her life.

Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream 13:11, July 11, 2011‎

October 2011

Please do not re-add the list of professional partners chart to Dancing with the Stars (U.S. TV series). This chart was a duplication of data in the List of Dancing with the Stars (U.S.) competitors article and merged there. If you have concerns, participate in discussions at Talk:Dancing with the Stars (U.S. TV series). Sottolacqua (talk) 20:32, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Strictly Come Dancing (series 9), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username GorillaWarfare. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed to be less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, – GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 11). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sottolacqua (talk) 10:40, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rob Kardashian, you may be blocked from editing. Jasper Deng (talk) 05:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Use proper spelling next time, and cite a reliable source.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:11, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 12). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [1]. Please stop changing the result to "semi-finalist." Sottolacqua (talk) 17:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2011

Please stop striking Albert's name from the episode 11 row of the game table. Doing so makes makes it look like he did not have immunity. The footnote should suffice on explaining what happened regarding his reward. If you absolutely feel that his name must be striked, please discuss it on the talk page. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:04, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Dancing with the Stars (U.S. season 14). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [2] Sottolacqua (talk) 23:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Survivor: One World. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:29, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Survivor: One World. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you remove sourced content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Basketball Wives, or engage in any other form of disruptive editing, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not make that necessary. Nightscream (talk) 23:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

I suggest you stop trying to mess the tables up. Don't do that again. --Tam001 (talk) 00:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Pardon??[reply]

Why are you removing that note from the candidates' session? There is nothing wrong with it. --Tam001 (talk) 09:24, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't understand why the weekly results aren't in alphabetical order. They seem trivial and do not need to follow a formal format.

It doesn't make any sense to use different sortings in these tables. They are already in alphabetical order, based on their last names. Do not change it again. Also, do not remove the note about Michael Andretti, there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. And don't try to add info about episodes we don't know nothing about yet. --Tam001 (talk) 18:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I felt the note was unnecessary since it is mentioned in the notes of Episode 1 and because Marco Andretti was not involved in any publicity for the show. I apologize if it was destructive but it seemed redundant to me.

Again, stop editing the candidates' backgrounds. They are supposed to mirror their descriptions in the show. Are you reading the edit summaries? --Tam001 (talk) 10:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? I felt that my edits did reflect their professions mentioned on the show, because not only was Patricia Velasquez a model, but Adam Carolla was a podcaster and Victoria Gotti was a reality tv star (both of which omitted previously). They are not destructive and do not need to be taken out.

That is not the pattern the articles follow. I reverted the edits again. --Tam001 (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. If I have to give links in order to prove that modeling is a part of Patricia Velasquez's background, then so be it. Frankly, it's stupid not to include that since she was a model since it is even stated that she was the first Latina supermodel in the biography for the show's website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by King1559 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if she is a model or not. The show doesn't list her as such in her confessionals and that's the pattern Wikipedia has been using since the first season started. If someone wants to see a full bio they can simply check her page. --Tam001 (talk) 12:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think I won't waste more of my time warning you and just point your edits as vandalism, as it seems you just keep doing it no matter how many people talk to you about it. --Tam001 (talk) 11:38, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why you are doing this. The edits are not made with ill intent. Just because they do not follow what the show describes verbatim doesn't mean it's wrong. For you to keep changing them is ridiculous.

April 2012

Please stop removing sourced content. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 20:50, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Real Housewives of New Jersey edits that you made

Why did you delete and remove content from the article? Also I noticed that what you added was what appears to be professional promotional content which makes certain characters appear in a positive light which may not be what readers are looking-for? If there is going to be a category of recurring characters, why would you delete "cousin Rosie"? And leave Granatell? You also deleted an episode preview and title which was sourced properly. Too many too mention, again I have to ask why? I am watching this page so please do not delete like this. Claudine is Dina's name. Ashlee may not be Ashley/Ashley's legal name so it does not need to be changed throughout the article. I don't know if Kathie was born in 1951 or not, that seems a little old it probably needs a reference but I am not changing your adds so please do not change other people's unless you have proof that it is a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.29.229 (talk) 17:04, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing and blanking of content without any rationale, and ignoring over a year's worth of repeated warnings, the most recent violation being these edits to The Real Housewives of New Jersey. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nightscream (talk) 17:20, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GAR for Hope Solo article

Hope Solo, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hmlarson (talk) 05:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.