User talk:173.66.204.41

December 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Challenge: Battle for a New Champion—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 04:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2024

Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hasan Minhaj have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Rachael Ray (talk show). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 06:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 01:54, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Mean Girls (2024 film)

Stop adding "mixed to positive" on pages that is SOURCED WITH MIXED RECEPTION. Oh yeah, and we go by what the based on credit says. No need to list every work it is based on in the lead. Most of your edits end up being reverted by multiple editors, which is very telling. Keep this track record up and it won't be surprising that you are blocked. Mike Allen 17:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss here and stop edit warring or you will be reported. YOU are adding content that goes against what sources say. Don't accuse me of "owning" a page just because I make sure guidelines and policies are followed. Mike Allen 18:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop talking to me in edit summaries. This is what a TALK PAGE is for. I said you are adding content that goes against what sources say, as in the "mixed to positive" reception. I don't care about it being written that it is based on the book. If no one else has an issue with it, then so be it. It. Is. Ok. No need for 10 sources. Mike Allen 18:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rachael Ray (talk show). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The same applies, of course, to any other page, but this is the one where you have most recently been edit-warring. JBW (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Showtime (TV network), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 02:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, and thank you for your efforts to improve Wikipedia, and in particular for adding references! However, adding a bare URL is not ideal, and exposes the reference to link rot. It is preferable to use proper citation templates when citing sources, including details such as title, author, date, and any other information necessary for a bibliographic citation. Here's an example of a full citation using the {{cite web}} template to cite a web page:

Lorem ipsum<ref>{{cite web |title=Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac |publisher=Canon Inc |work=Ask a Question |date=2022 |url=https://support.usa.canon.com/kb/index?page=content&id=ART174839 |access-date=2022-04-02}}</ref> dolor sit amet.

which displays inline in the running text of the article as:

Lorem ipsum^[1] dolor sit amet.

and displays under References as:

1. ^ Download the Scanning Software - Windows and Mac". Ask a Question. Canon Inc. 2022. Retrieved 2022-04-02.

If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Once again, thanks for adding references to articles. Spinixster (trout me!) 10:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Do not re-add information to an infobox on Wikipedia, as you did at Glen Powell, without giving a valid reason for the addition in the edit summary. Your content addition was not constructive, was contrary to the Wikipedia's precept Template:Infobox person#Parameters/education / alma mater, and has been reverted. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. You have been warned before and disruptive editing will result in the loss of editing privileges without further warning. Thank you, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 05:45, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CanonNi. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Josh Meyers (actor), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 05:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.