User talk:168.200.2.1

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 168.200.2.1, is registered to University of Colorado Hospital Authority and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.

In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thank you for experimenting with the page August 2 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Fabricationary 16:02, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to George Jameson. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Neil916 (Talk) 21:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page User_talk:Ddstretch on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Coldmachine^Talk 11:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nikita Mikhalkov has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 09:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Moldova has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Razor flame 03:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Randolph School has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Inferno, Lord of Penguins 22:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please disregard this message; the removal of information was done in good faith. --Jh12 (talk) 04:21, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Toyota FJ Cruiser. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me) 21:03, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ranger (character class) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Ranger (character class) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://worldofmidgardranger.weebly.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

September 2014

Hello, I'm Seaphoto. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Hello Kitty, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Seaphoto^Talk 19:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chronic traumatic encephalopathy has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:08, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planters Fools' Day (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Planters Fools' Day and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 03:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 168.200.2.1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333 -blue 03:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Planters Fools' Day (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at April Fools' Day#History. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Planters Fools' Day and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 03:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stace Nelson has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 14:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Planters Fools' Day

Hello, 168.200.2.1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Planters Fools' Day".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:16, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.