Jump to content

User talk:164.127.1.227

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (164.127.1.227) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing!  Seagull123  Φ  16:49, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Hello, It has come to my attention one of the recent editions pertaining to Freelancer.com got deleted by anonymous user labeling the deleted material as "irrelevant": https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Freelancer.com&type=revision&diff=783370051&oldid=782098366

I believe it is relevant as similar websites do have section where user experiences are described. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upwork#Customer_feedback_and_complaints https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guru.com#Customer_feedback_and_complaints

Furthermore, the user in question uses Australian IP. Coincidentally, Freelancer.com is Australian company.

164.127.1.227 (talk) 15:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, first, welcome! Now, if you have an issue with a certain edit, it's best to raise that edit with the editor on the article's talk page, asking them why they did it and what you think should happen - remembering the bold, revert, discuss cycle. Then, I should point out that on Wikipedia, you should assume good faith, so assuming that someone may have a COI because they are in the same country as where the company is from is a no-no. I should probably also point out Wikipedia's policy on the "posting of personal information", just for reference (not saying that you have done anything wrong, though). I'm not going to discuss whether the section should be in the article or not, as it would be best for you and the concerned editor to discuss this on the talk page - I will also ask the other editor to talk about it on the talk page. I would also suggest having a look at this section of the talk page about the reviews. If you need more help, have a look at the message I've left at the top of this page, click here, or just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Seagull123  Φ  16:48, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Freelancer.com#Concerns about removal of a section.  Seagull123  Φ  16:55, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]