User talk:160.79.33.71

pseudoscience

I advise you to take heed of your last blocks. And not try to push Fringe theories like climate change is not real. Slatersteven (talk) 16:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry. May I please have another chance? 160.79.33.71 (talk) 22:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you undo closes of silly threads you will get a longer block. Slatersteven (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

160.79.33.71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I deeply regret and apologize for delving into fringe beliefs regarding astrology. I have never edited Wikipedia before and I wasn’t sure about its policies; however, I have since read all of them and I’m asking for a second chance to contribute positively to the project. I will gladly accept a topic ban on astrology and its associated pages if unblocked early. Thank you. 160.79.33.71 (talk) 22:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The statement at " 23:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)" saying that two near-identical edits by the one IP weren't the same person, is too farcical to accept. Declining unblock. Daniel (talk) 01:57, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) You were blocked for the same disruptive editing behavior in March for six months. When the block expired, that was your second chance. Schazjmd (talk) 23:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was a different user, as this is an IP address. I did not make those disruptive edits.

160.79.33.71 (talk) 23:22, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edits before this block and the edits before the March block are the pretty much the same: compare this edit to this edit. Schazjmd (talk) 23:29, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn’t me.

160.79.33.71 (talk) 23:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

331dot (talk) 00:04, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.