Jump to content

User talk:15thWardWestBank

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, 15thWardWestBank, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Red beans & ricely, Infrogmation (talk) 00:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hi. It looks like you've put some mistaken information into articles regarding locations in New Orleans wards. See Wards of New Orleans for descriptions, locations, and maps showing where the wards are. Hope this helps! Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 17:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Melphomene Projects"

[edit]

A page you created, Melphomene Projects, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Falcon8765 (talk) 17:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected it to the correct spelling, Melpomene Projects. Named after Melpomene Street in New Orleans, which in turn was named after Melpomene. Cheers, Infrogmation (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another note: articles, like users, have Wikipedia:Talk pages. If you disagree with other users edits or have questions, please discuss on the talk page, or explain your edit in the edit summary. Please don't keep reverting without explanation. Thanks. If you have questions, feel free to ask. Infrogmation (talk) 17:14, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I reverted your edit [1] to Housing Authority of New Orleans. The spelling of Melpomene is mentioned above. Yeah, some people in New Orleans say it like "Melf"; lots of streets are pronounced in different ways, but that doesn't change how they're spelled nor what the official name is. The Magnolia Projects are/were Uptown along Freret from Washington Avenue to Louisiana Avenue, not in the "3rd Ward" -- look at any maps showing showing the streets by the Magnolia and compare it to the Ward boundaries. I'm assuming good faith in your edits, but it looks like you're putting in dubious material. If you disagree with my reverting you, please discuss either here or (even more appropriately, I think) in the article talk page. Thanks. Infrogmation (talk) 01:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Re: [2] More of the same without discussion can result in an editing block on your account. Infrogmation (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If there is any reason for your edits, please discuss them on relevent talk pages of articles or give explanation. You give wards other than the actual geographic location of places. It is unclear what your claim of wards "to locals" is supposed to mean. Wards are divisions of New Orleans set by local law. Infrogmation (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please discuss/explain your recent edit at Talk:3rd Ward of New Orleans. Thanks. Infrogmation (talk) 03:21, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1719

[edit]

Re this edit of yours: [http://www.algierspoint.org/ AlgiersPoint.org front page and Algiers Historical Society give it as 1719. Reason for the change you made? -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

[edit]

Thanks for uploading photos. You need to add information on the photos for Wikimedia to keep using them. Did you take the photos yourself, and if not who did? What license? Again, if you have questions about Wikipedia policies or procedures you can't find an answer to, ask. Thanks. Infrogmation (talk) 09:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Calliope Project.jpg missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Calliope Project.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Infrogmation (talk) 08:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Calliope Projects.jpg missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Calliope Projects.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Infrogmation (talk) 08:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lafitte Projects.jpg missing description details

[edit]
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Lafitte Projects.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Infrogmation (talk) 09:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:St thomas projects.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

File source problem with File:Central city.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Central city.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.


[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Desire project 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 05:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Desire project 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 05:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 05:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Fischer project.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 10:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 10:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Florida projects renovated.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 03:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 03:11, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Naval Support Area

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of U.S. Naval Support Area, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/12/5/snapshot.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, U.S. Naval Support Area, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/12/5/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, U.S. Naval Support Area appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. U.S. Naval Support Area has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:03, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Tall Timbers Brechtel, New Orleans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/12/9/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, Tall Timbers Brechtel, New Orleans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Tall Timbers Brechtel, New Orleans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, New Aurora, New Orleans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/13/8/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, New Aurora, New Orleans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. New Aurora, New Orleans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, English Turn, New Orleans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/13/8/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, English Turn, New Orleans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. English Turn, New Orleans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Behrman, New Orleans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/12/7/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, Behrman, New Orleans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Behrman, New Orleans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Christopher Homes, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/12/7/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, Christopher Homes appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Christopher Homes has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Christopher Homes and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Christopher Homes with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Christopher Homes.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Little Woods, New Orleans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/9/49/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, Little Woods, New Orleans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Little Woods, New Orleans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Plum Orchard, New Orleans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/9/51/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, Plum Orchard, New Orleans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Plum Orchard, New Orleans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:16, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Read Boulevard West, New Orleans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/9/53/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, Read Boulevard West, New Orleans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Read Boulevard West, New Orleans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:18, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Read Boulevard East, New Orleans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/9/52/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, Read Boulevard East, New Orleans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Read Boulevard East, New Orleans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Viavant/Venetian Isles, New Orleans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/11/54/index.html. As a copyright violation, Viavant/Venetian Isles, New Orleans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Viavant/Venetian Isles, New Orleans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lake Catherine, New Orleans, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gnocdc.org/orleans/11/73/snapshot.html. As a copyright violation, Lake Catherine, New Orleans appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lake Catherine, New Orleans has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 31 hours, for repeated copyright violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 18:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for repeated copyright violations. Please read the linked page so you understand the issues. Failure to do so, and continued repeated copyvios will get you blocked indefinitely. Please contribute responsibly and follow the rules. Thank you for your attention. -- Alexf(talk) 18:51, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:15thWardWestBank&oldid=692234250"