User talk:151.67.87.93

Personal attack

its "pičku (or "pichku") materinu". I will see that this article is protected from IP users. DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 12:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perchè non c'incontriamo a Spalato, magari a casa tua e ci parliamo faccia a faccia? I would like to meet you! LEO

I'm much too afraid of you to meet you. :D LOLLLLL!!!! ROTFL!!
Typical. maybe you can send me a couple of fish like in the Godfather? Violance is all some people can understand. Certainly not complex international historical issues. DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 12:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tu sei il militarista non io!!!! You like war, what do you prefer: guns or bombs? Godfather is militarist exactly like as you!!!! I will go to Spalato to meet it:Nina Moric for 2 weeks of good sexual connection!!!! LEO

(Shows what you know about Militarism!) I am not a warmonger, why would I be? Dalmatia has all it could possibly want from Italia. (The mafia is not militarist under any definition.) What? Why are you going to Spalato? I suppose you will go by plane or ferry, when exactly will you be arriving to my city? DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 13:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am a dealer of Brembo: spesso vado a Spalato. Ti farò sapere. LEO

I ask because I may have to return to Zagreb. But you just give me the time and place and I can arrange everything. DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 14:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Il problema è questo: are you in organized and sponsored group by a nationalist Croatian party? Incontrandoti comunque non chiariei la situazione. Administrators will study this bad situation. LEO

OF COURSE NOT! I'D GO AS FAR AS TO SAY I DESPISE CROATIAN NATIONALISTS. YOU STARTED WITH CONCEALED THREATS, WITH YOUR MESSSAGE OF "MEETING ME" IN SPLIT. I AM NOT IN ANY ORGANISED GROUP, AND AM NOT A MEMBER OF ANY POLITICAL PARTY WHATSOEVER. DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 14:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Very well) Like I said before you removed my statement: in my view, verbal disputes should be settled verbally. DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 18:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning regarding personal attack

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This administrator has reviewed this matter; there is no place for such language or sentiments on Wikipedia - if you are not interested in contributing civily then WP would rather you not edit. LessHeard vanU (talk) 15:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Maxim 15:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

151.67.87.93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I contest because DIREKTOR violated administrator's warning in Istrian exodus with revert edit warring!!!! DIREKTOR even removed his edits in this talk but I reverted after his deletion.

Decline reason:

This is not about DIREKTOR, this is about you. — Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 18:21, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Allegations

Why are you trying to get me blocked when I clearly didn't violate my restriction? Here's the Istrian exodus History page: [1]. I reverted on 22 October 2007, and then once more on 16 November 2007. (User:Giovanni Giove and myself are restricted to one revert per week, with discussion.)
I also tried to discuss my edit (here: [2]), but recieved no reply from the IP user reporting me, who strangely makes exacty the same grammar mistakes as the already blocked User:Giovanni Giove. DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 18:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But you are not onesto per discutere qui con dichiarazioni assurde: se io e Giovanni sbagliamo la grammatica inglese, significa che dobbiamo migliorare la conoscenza dell'inglese non altro!!!! LEO

I am honest, I made (at most) one revert per week per article, with discussion. Why should I be blocked?
Also the version of the article you are reverting is a hard-won consensus, it is grammatically correct, and is according to Wiki policy (post WW2 contemporary English names are used, etc...). What's the problem, even you pals said OK to with this version? DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 18:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Allegations2

Not to be biased or anything, but if you had not attacked Direktor in the first place, he wouldn't have gotten mad. Look before you leap next time. Best, --Gp75motorsports (talk) 15:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.