User talk:151.13.16.218

August 2013

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Adempiere because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 12:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm Bollyjeff. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Krav Maga, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your additions should sound unbiased, and be backed by reliable sources, not your own opinion stated as fact. BollyJeff | talk 15:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Krav Maga. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:50, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please take this to talk:Krav Maga You have been reverted by two editors. See WP:Bold, revert, discuss on this situation. Continuing to WP:Edit war may result in this discussion being taken to WP:AN/EW. Jim1138 (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Krav Maga. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 13:49, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry that you defend those who do not want to write the truth in wikipedia. The truth is annoying but it is fair to write it.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Monte Ascensione (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Monte Ascensione and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! 151.13.16.218, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:35, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Cagliari

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Cagliari, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 12:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Monte Ascensione concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Monte Ascensione, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

United World Wrestling

Do not re-add grappling to the list of disciplines. It is not a currently sponsored or sanctioned event, and does not belong. Period. I have removed it repeatedly for that reason. Do not re-add it, or I will pursue a block. oknazevad (talk) 13:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure that the sport of grappling is currently recognized by the UWW. You can check on the official website of the UWW.

Your draft article, Draft:Monte Ascensione

Hello, 151.13.16.218. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Monte Ascensione".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:37, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.