User talk:1506Sd
Welcome!
[edit]
|
May 2022
[edit]Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Sara Ali Khan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 16:13, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MS Dhoni. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Grabup (talk) 06:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Punjabi people, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
I don't understand how was that vandalism 1506Sd (talk) 03:52, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
I had just provided an addition I think. 1506Sd (talk) 03:54, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Dear Grabeup I just added the fact that he hails originally was from Uttrakhand which is true and yeah if you are talking about providing citation I will add it. 1506Sd (talk) 03:59, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- If you can provide reliable source for what you want to add, then you are welcome to add but Beawar that adding anything without reliable citation will be removed instantly. You can lose your editing privilege If you continue to add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Grabup (talk) 07:00, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Dear Grabup I did and you can check for your satisfaction, Thanks for guiding me. 1506Sd (talk) 08:24, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
- @1506Sd, Yeah you did a good work by citing a reliable source. But you did a mistake by removing another reliable source which you shouldn't without any valid reason. I recovered that source. Thanks. Grabup (talk) 08:42, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Might have been typo error, thanks for rectifying it appreciate it. 1506Sd (talk) 09:07, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Punjab, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kangri. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khatri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kangri.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 21
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Punjab, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kangri and Bagri.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Nope I hadn't, they are links pointing to different sites. 1506Sd (talk) 14:17, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Krushna Abhishek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Reliability of sources
[edit]Publications by the Goverment of India are obviously reliable when used to support a number of statements, for example whether a language has official status, or how many people said they spoke the language during the last census. This doesn't mean that every single webpage that appears somewhere on a .gov.in domain is automatically a reliable source for everything that it says. Please also note that one of the two websites you're citing, https://www.indiamapped.com, is not published by the goverment. Regardless, both websites appear to be taking their content from Wikipedia itself: even apart from all other considerations, this by itself makes them inadmissible anywhere on Wikipedia (see WP:REFLOOP).
For most statements in language articles (like linguistic classification or precise geographic extent), we're generally aiming for a higher standard of sources: ideally peer-reviewed academic publications. This is a far cry from the basic information pages that are so easy to find on the internet, even if some are maintained as part of a governement programme. You know, I think you may want to take the time to read Wikipedia:Reliable sources. If you do, then I believe you will better understand why other people on Wikipedia do what they do, and your experience of the place will be less frustrating. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 20:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dogras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
July 2024
[edit]Hello! I'm Re Packer&Tracker. Your recent edit(s) to the page Muhammad of Ghor appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 15:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dogras, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The list was removed by Sitush before for being unsourced, but you keep on adding it again and again. The WP:ONUS is on you to provide reliable source with each entry, otherwise we are going to remove for failing WP:V. This is a standalone article and demand sources. It is not other editors' job to verify respective articles (which are mostly unsourced / inadequately sourced). Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:21, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- "Almost no Khatri population in that time in such-and-such place" isn't a valid argument. The Banda Singh Bahadur mentions Dogra Rajput, Khatri and non-Dogra Rajput with proper sources. As for this, what's the page number? A direct link to the page would be useful. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 20:27, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is a seach bar below you can seach key words like Banda Singh or Rajput to get a hint of page and data. Also it's source of main article on Banda Singh Bahadur from where I got this source, thanks 1506Sd (talk) 11:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Seach Rajput in small search bar below your query would be satisfied. Thanks. 1506Sd (talk) 11:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- If you want a specific page info it's Page 33 1506Sd (talk) 12:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- You used the wrong source. It was used to support the Bharadwaj Rajput part not Dogra Rajput. Quote from the source (page 33) - "
The poet wants to assert that Banda was the religious descendant of Guru Gobind Singh and the 11th guru of the Sikhs. For this purpose, he acclaimed that Banda was a Sodhi Khatri. Actually, Banda was Bhardwaj Rajput. The poet knows that only the Sodhi Khatri could be the guru of the Sikhs. He seems, to be aware of the Sikh tradition that the guruship would remain within the limit of the Sodhi's.
". The source used for Dogra Rajput in that article is this, and it doesn't mention "Dogra". - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:18, 25 August 2024 (UTC)- Banda Singh was from Minhas clan (for which I am attaching source) and Minhas is part of Dogra clans as you might know. I would attach source of it on both articles. 1506Sd (talk) 13:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Moreover Bhardwaj is a gotra not clan, Dogra was (and even now) used for people and clans (primarily Brahmins and Rajputs) native to erstwhile Duggar region (including Rajouri) and it's well known knowledge that he was from Minhas clan which is a part of Dogra group. 1506Sd (talk) 13:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter what I know, the sources should explicitly mention that Banda Bahadur was a Dogra, which the WP:READERS should easily identify with. Find sources (WP:HISTRS compliant) that explicitly mention that. This college website is not a reliable source even it had mentioned "Dogra". I've removed both for contravening WP:NOR, I'd suggest peeking at the policy. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Found the source in form of account of Sri Chand Narang in book of Banda Singh Bahadur, source cited with direct access to page mentioning it which is 83. Thanks 1506Sd (talk) 10:04, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter what I know, the sources should explicitly mention that Banda Bahadur was a Dogra, which the WP:READERS should easily identify with. Find sources (WP:HISTRS compliant) that explicitly mention that. This college website is not a reliable source even it had mentioned "Dogra". I've removed both for contravening WP:NOR, I'd suggest peeking at the policy. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- You used the wrong source. It was used to support the Bharadwaj Rajput part not Dogra Rajput. Quote from the source (page 33) - "
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)