Jump to content

User talk:146.90.208.196

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Patrick Hurley

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Orange sticker. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Patrick Hurley (British politician) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Orange sticker (talk) 08:25, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted you because it was an WP:IDL change. Your own comment states that it "seemed" to be a failure in NPOV but seem means it is giving YOU the impression of being something or having a particular quality, which it is just another way of saying it's your opinion. Please show the exact phrasing that is not written in a factually or neutral manner?146.90.208.196 (talk) 09:32, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, you're wrong, I happen to think the MP is making a complete fool out of himself, however, you have employed WP:OR and WP:SYNTH by referencing a poll about Labour's popularity and a link to MP's salaries. You have used his tweet WP:PRIMARY and then applied your own, non-neutral commentary. The only third party reporting is from a blacklisted source, however unless this receives significant coverage from a WP:RS I would argue including this still violates WP:NPOV, WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE. I won't enter into an edit war however I doubt your addition will remain in place for long due to the reasons I've mentioned. Orange sticker (talk) 09:43, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No I haven't done any of those things you are suggesting. Where is the original research?
  • the UK currently has serious issues to address
  • the MP represents the electorate of Southport
  • the MP earns nearly £100k
  • the MP makes a frivolous tweet about cutting sweet prices
All these facts are in context and referenced. Maybe Nero didn't fiddle while Rome burned or Marie Antoinette never suggested cake but history remembered. You're just another wiki rules lawyer trying to fix the narrative to what you want.146.90.208.196 (talk) 09:51, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
please read WP:SYNTH Orange sticker (talk) 10:10, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

معادلات الحقوق للمرأة المعينة لدى النظام السياسي

[edit]

من مستندات دخول المرأة في حقوقها عن سياسة الدول وما يتداول قوة فعالية اعمال النساء في مساعدة التبادل في تنظيم واضح يعرف في سجلات هاريس المنتخبة في الى رئاسة الولايات المتحدة الامريكية عن تمركزها الديمقراطي الذي يشن محبة الى الجمهوريين بأبتسامة ثقتها الرئاسية عن مواثيق ترامب الذي يحترم سياسة اصوات المرأة وينظم سجلاته تحت بنود النساء لأن معادلات سياسة المرأة تترتب علة تنظيم وقت الاعمال في تنظيم وقت المنزل فإن الية الفنون النسائية تكثفت في مثقال اعلى تقييماً من فكرية ايجابية تعطي الامل الواسع في سجلات سياسة المرأة المعاصرة لدى التحكيم السياسي المستند في سجلات اعمالهم وما ينقص منهم فهو ناقص ومن يكرمهم فهو كريم .

والحمدلله لقيادة الملكة الليزابيث وما قادة من فتح حكومات واسعة وتأسيس دولية الاتحاد عن المملكة المتحدة لقومية الحركية المعدلة في النساء والرجال عن حكمة المرأة وصبرها على هذه الحياة التي تحتاج تواجدها بدافع سياستها التحكيمية لحكمتها الفكرية فإن النساء هم اكتمال الحنان السياسي والرحمة الانسانية .

والحمدلله على تواجد المرأة بكوننا الارضي . KuwQ8yy (talk) 12:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:146.90.208.196&oldid=1250606146"