User talk:1377 AM (Dagupan)
Appearance
October 2018
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Drmies (talk) 00:31, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- WayKurat, you probably know this one--do we have an SPI for it? Bbb23? Also User talk:DWAG Radio Umak. Drmies (talk) 00:32, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Drmies: I haven't checked it myself, but I assume it's Bertrand101 (talk · contribs · count)--Bbb23 (talk) 00:34, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, Bbb23, I see that now--I just ran into your earlier check on that range. I'll tag them--do you need them added to the SPI? And why can't this person just play by the rules? Drmies (talk) 00:36, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Drmies: They don't need to be added to the case. You can tag them if you wish because you blocked them outside the SPI, but just so you know, this master's socks are not normally tagged per WP:DENY.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:13, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Bbb. I await the psychological analysis. Drmies (talk) 02:42, 25 October 2018 (UTC)