User talk:131.10.254.60

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, papa1.barksdale.af.mil (131.10.254.60), is registered to United States Air Force and may be shared by multiple users of a government agency or facility, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

In the event of vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for your agency or facility's administration to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time and abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for further investigation.

Some government IP addresses are considered sensitive. If blocking this IP address, determine if Wikipedia:SIP applies; if so, follow directions.

Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Anaheim, California has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 22:56, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Anaheim, California. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 22:57, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Anaheim, California. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Martin451 (talk) 23:01, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Lubbock, Texas. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. -- Voltin (talk) 04:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Barbara Boxer. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ⊃°HotCROCODILE...... (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dothan, Alabama

Information pertaining to the state of Alabama should be in the article that is for the state it's self and not in the articles pertaining to cities, towns, villages or counties within the state. Also please make sure that you properly source anything you add. Happy editing. Also the edit you made to Dothan, Alabama was reverted as a Good Faith edit, meaning it was consider to be an attempt at editing wisely and good but was not in the right place or in the right way. You are in no trouble. If you need anything you can ask me on my talk page have a good day now. Rgood erm ote 19:54, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Alabama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. -Fnlayson (talk) 14:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Meth mouth has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing _{Vandalize me} 07:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Anaheim, California. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 09:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bear, Delaware. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. bobrayner (talk) 23:10, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Lubbock, Texas. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 23:11, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Scorpions (band) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Trusilver 06:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ulrich Schnauss, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deagle_AP (talk) 12:50, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 12:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

131.10.254.60 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Are there any sexual favors i could perform to let me get unblocked?

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 13:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

131.10.254.60 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Awwwww... i was like 100% someone would accept my sexual favors. They're the best. But i guess i'll wait my 24 hours. This has certainly taught me a great morale lesson. Wiki vandalism isn't a victimless crime. I wasn't thinking about the families. The wives, children, brothers, sisters, cats and dogs and even fish that were harmed in the making of this film. I love you with all my heart, and i hope we can move past this and make sweet love sometime in the future. Maybe within then next 24 hours... when i become unblocked.. and my protection is removed... the block is like a wiki-condom... and when it's removed... i'll make so many constructive contribution babies with you. Oh i can't wait... i'll see you then .. snookums!

Decline reason:

Okay. Closedmouth (talk) 14:16, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Springhill, Louisiana, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits can be seen here. — MrDolomite • Talk 18:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chief Master Sergeant, you may be blocked from editing. Your edit can be seen here. — MrDolomite • Talk 18:12, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Airman First Class, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edit can be seen here. — MrDolomite • Talk 18:14, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Staff Sergeant, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edit can be seen here. — MrDolomite • Talk 18:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 31 hours, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Dreadstar ☥ 18:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Shane Carwin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TreyGeek (talk) 20:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 week, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Final Fantasy X has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 10metreh (talk) 18:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Antoine Dodson, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Click here to submit a false positive report.
Edit this page and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 17:44, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Antoine Dodson, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:

Click here to submit a false positive report.
Edit this page and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 19:34, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Antoine Dodson. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 19:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harvard College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 19:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Young Bleed ‎ , but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (131.10.254.60) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Metiscus (talk) 16:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.