User talk:12gh00p

can some professional editor please review what is going on with this account. the rules to deal with this are beyond complicated for someone who does not live on wikipedia. one of the editors is insisting on eliminating documented facts and content that is irrefutable. if one of the editors would please read the changes. when this editor successfully eraased most of the content, i tried to erase all of it so there was not a misleading wikipedia entry. i was then repeatedly blocked. i did log on a second time from a diffeent computer, and just tried to put the clear facts back. this person blocked that computer. if someone senior reads this and reviews all the facts, they will see there is no manipulation or misleading going on. this is insanity and it is IMPOSSIBLE to understand how to formally protest this. hence this post.

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vvv321, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Keri (talk) 18:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

it is impossible to understand what to do to respond to being blocked. if someone can speak english to me, it would be appreciated. all edits that were attempted to be made to this entry have been properly footnoted and are accurate. someone keeps erasing all the facts or claims they are not true. i just want a real editor to review the constant changes and let the true facts speak for themselves.