Jump to content

User talk:125.168.94.221

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello 125.168.94.221!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (125.168.94.221) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started.

Happy editing! - wolf 18:42, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

January 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hunter-class frigate. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - wolf 18:45, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Added note

[edit]

Please see WP:BRD, which starts with you;

  • Boldy making an edit. Your edit gets;
  • Reverted. If you disagree, you then;
  • Discuss the issue on the article talk page.

You do not however, continue to revert back to your preferred version. That is the first step in an edit war, a prohibited behavior on Wikipedia. Basically, everyone thinks they're right, that their edits make for the better version. That is why articles are taken back to QUO during a dispute and remain as such while the matter is discussed. Your edits are not lost, they are (as you know) still in the page history. If, at the conclusion of the discussion, there is a consensus that supports your edit, then it goes back to that version. If not, you are free to then pursue dispute resolution. - wolf 18:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hunter-class frigate. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 22:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Added note

[edit]

You were already notified of the edit warring policy, but as you have again reverted that page, here is the prerequisite warning. I'm not entirely sure what your hurry is, it has been less than a day since the last edits and interaction. You have made mass changes to a significant amount of content, also involving multiple sources. All this needs to reviewed. You also need to give any other interested parties an opportunity to take part. This is not done to whatever rushed timetable you try to dictate. Your impatience is disruptive. It may very well be that your changes are the most appropriate ones for the article, but it's not as if they 'must be there right away!'. I strongly encourage you to self-revert and allow the process to play out. - wolf 23:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Demographics of Australia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Queensland state election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]