User talk:124.215.138.169

January 2017

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to GunZ 2 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at GunZ 2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at GunZ 2, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 22:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kirkuk has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Kirkuk was changed by 124.215.138.169 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887215 on 2017-10-22T16:23:19+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kirkuk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 16:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Lets talk

Hi

Would you join me on the Honorary Aryan talk page so we can dialogue? TantraYum (talk) 03:18, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

• • As I mentioned before, even your own source from "Hoffmann 2000, pp. 50, 51." specifically said that Emil Maurice was INFORMALLY declared "honorary aryans" and NEVER FORMALLY declared an "honorary aryan." I challenge you to find any historical record that specifically lists Emil Maurice as an "honorary aryan"...but you and I both know that you will not find any documents pertaining to this. Simply because Emil Maurice was just INFORMALLY granted "honorary aryan" status but NOT official FORMAL recognition as an "honorary aryan"...there is a major difference between INFORMAL and FORMAL recognition. And the only reason he was granted INFORMAL "honorary aryan" status was because Emil Maurice had been a personal friend of Adolf Hitler prior to anyone knowing about his partial Jewish ancestry, and despite Himmler's attempt to remove him from the SS since all SS officers needed to prove racial purity with no Jewish ancestry, Adolf Hitler wrote a letter and ordered Himmler to overlook his status and grant him INFORMAL "honorary aryan" status but NOT OFFICIAL FORMAL recognition, hence you will never find any documents to support your idea that Jews were "honorary aryans" which they were absolutely not. Hitler had a tremendous disrespect towards Jews and regarded them as "inferior subhumans". Do not forget millions of Jews died in the holocaust genocide at the dirty hands of the Nazi Germans, where was their "honorary aryan" status??? NEVER FORGET THE HOLOCAUST! History must never repeat itself! Thank you! 124.215.138.169 (talk) 03:27, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

first off, thanks for replying!

2nd off, I have copied this to talk page, that is the place to discuss content, will reply there. warmly, TantraYum (talk) 03:57, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Honorary Aryan

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Honorary Aryan. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

• Please read WP:SPS for why blogs are not acceptable as reliable sources, and WP:RS for why a book by a non-historian published by a house which speciales in the occult and other esoteric subjects is not a reliable source for historical fact. If you want to discuss this, I've started a section on the article talk page. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

---