User talk:124.169.34.18

See WP:Verifiability -- WP doesn't place the premium on "truth" -- you must prove your case, especially with a controversial assertion. Chensiyuan (talk) 01:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why you would regard it as controversial. The judgement was made public and was widely reported on and discussed at the time. The judges are unlikley to have released a judgement they are not happy to have made public. Hewas a drug courier - he was convicted - his appeal was rejected - the judgement is on the public record and did not address all aspects of the appeal - the media reported it - he was hanged - he was buried in Melbourne. How can you pick and choose which facts to keep in and which ones to leave out? I think it is an interesting part of the story. I think the whole thing was above board - I hope in removing this fact you are not alleging foul play in Singapore?

April 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Revenge—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.