User talk:123Steller
|
|
Could you check on this?
[edit]Hi,
please check this edit [1], I did not revert it, but I have the suspicion the IP possibly changed to the modern spelling in written, and thus overriding the original historical form, that the given source would also attest from the 16th century...I am 95-99 % sure, but please reinforce if my suspicion is correct or not, if yes, you could also revert the edit. Thanks(KIENGIR (talk) 21:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC))
- Hi. Sure, done. 123Steller (talk) 23:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
User:123Steller/common.js is being categorized
[edit]User:123Steller/common.js is categorized, see Category:Former countries in the Balkans for an example. Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡæl.ərˌɛs/)[1] 23:34, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Your .js page
[edit]Hi User:123Steller, it appears that you have copied the entire content of the Austria-Hungary article into your User:123Steller/common.js page. That's not the place for an article and your .js page is showing up on 28 or so categories intended for articles. Could you remove it please? --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Could you check on this?
[edit]Steller, @Fakirbakir:,
Just to be as sharply objective as possible, could both of you check on the latest revision of the IP: [2]
The suspected preliminaries are: [3] and [4]
Well, it seems to me it is a similar "attempt" with a little bit altered data, with an existing name about a Romanian statistician, Sabin Manuilă, thus my former concern about a possible fake person to be "eliminiated"...but I never heard of this estimation or found any reinforcement for this....it seems weird...Could you check on Romanian/Hungarian/International sources any reference or reinforcement? Thanks(KIENGIR (talk) 21:52, 19 September 2017 (UTC))
ANI Experiences survey
[edit]Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.
The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:
If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.
Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, 123Steller. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Category:Transhumant ethnic groups has been nominated for discussion
[edit]
Category:Transhumant ethnic groups, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rgvis (talk) 12:42, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Help desk
[edit]Hello, I have copied your recent question from the talk page to the help desk itself. Eagleash (talk) 12:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Removal of Tara Romaneasca
[edit]Hi,
Could you please provide a reason for deleting an addition to the Origin of the Romanians article where the name of the "Tara Romaneasca" was added by me, because while the exonym of Wallachia was omnipresent the actual name of the country was not mentioned at all. Considering the article substance it only seems sensible to let the users know how the Romanians called one of their own principality since the 13th century onward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cealicuca (talk • contribs) 20:44, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
- This topic belongs to Talk:Origin of the Romanians. The reasons were presented by Borsoka. 123Steller (talk) 08:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Stubes99
[edit]DeltaQuad If your hobby is to block my blasphemous sock accounts, I guess you should also take care of User:Stubes99's account Filederchest (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), that is undisturbedly making edits for over a year. If the arguments from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Stubes99 are not enough, i will happily provide you more proofs that this is his sock. 123Steller (talk) 08:08, 13 July 2018 (UTC)