Jump to content

User talk:1234tomdorman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, 1234tomdorman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Hi, this "welcome" may be a bit late as you seem to be doing very well contributing already. I noticed your editing at architects Frost & Granger article (which it seems I started several years ago) and linked articles, and I notice in particular what looks like carefully done work on your part to expand Frost's lists of works, including noting shared attribution to Granger. Thank you for that! You might be interested in following discussion at wt:nrhp; feel free to post there and to join the NRHP WikiProject if you like (by adding your name at wp:NRHP. cheers, --doncram 19:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1234tomdorman, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi 1234tomdorman! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bradford Gilbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, New York. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think

[edit]

about changing Category:Railroad architects to something like Railroad station architects? Also, if you put something, anything, on your user page then your user name will change into a blue link rather than being the red one that it is now. This suggests to others, or at least to me, that you are not the dead end that red links suggest and that perhaps you are even a serious editor who intends to stay around. The "User Page" tab at the top left of this page will change color too. Consider it, Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 20:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had started a category "Railroad Station Architects" when I discovered a category "Railway architects" already existed, so changing it would be fine with me. But I suppose the original creator of "Category:Railway architects" may not have wanted to appear to limit the category to only stations. An architect, particularly one employed full time by the railroad, might design shop buildings, roundhouses, or any other structure the railroad needed, not just stations. So it may be best to leave the category name as it is. 1234tomdorman (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough for me, so leave it as is. Carptrash (talk) 00:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Ipswich Railway Workshops War Memorial being a good example of . . ..."Other." Carptrash (talk) 01:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 May

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neel Reid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Railroad. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, 1234tomdorman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, 1234tomdorman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, 1234tomdorman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, 1234tomdorman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

City of San Francisco train wreck

[edit]

Hello, and nice to have another railfan on Wikipedia. Regarding this edit, [1], I've been hesitant to put GPS co-ordinates in this article for two reasons. First, I have been unable to find any source that lists exactly where it occurred beyond "Bridge number 4" and "about 1.5 miles east of Harney". Making it more of a mystery, as is visible in a satellite image of the area [2], the railroad tracks have been rebuilt. Scanning the canyon, it is visible there are 5 or 6 places where there used to be a handful of sharp curves, but the river was re-channeled to allow the tracks to be rebuilt with less sharp curves (here's another one farther east [3]). I have no idea if this track relocation happened before or after the 1939 accident, but likely after. If after, it's possible that bridge number 4 no longer exists today, or exists but is no longer the 4th bridge. The video you linked (good find BTW) supports the tracks were re-aligned after the accident, as at 4:15 it shows a tunnel visible on the unharmed Western Pacific track, but scanning Google Satellite there is no tunnel in the immediate vicinity of Harney today, (there are a few farther east in the canyon). That's not surprising, in the era of pick-axes and black powder tunnels were generally cheaper than mountain cuts, but today in the era of big earth movers cuts are generally cheaper than tunnels. Many smaller railroad tunnels have been daylighted when tracks have been rebuilt. A satellite scan of the canyon today reveals several sizable mountain cuts that could have been tunnels at one time, including these, which are in the right area[4][5].

But others have put GPS co-ordinates in the article and I haven't protested. But just so you know, this edit summary is not likely correct, the northernmost track is the former Western Pacific track, it is the southernmost track that is the former Southern Pacific track, and the Reno Gazette Journal article used as a source for this article is clear the accident happened on the SP track. See these two maps [6], this makes it clear the SP track was the southernmost track and this map [7] makes it clear that Harney is along the southernmost track, the equivalent siding for the northernmost track (WP track) is Cluro.

The video is a good find; a young, budding documentation. It has some problems, but is a good start and the director shows promise. Unfortunately it cannot be used as a source, as the movie is clearly using Wikipedia as a source (in fact there are entire paragraphs from this article that appear in the documentary verbatim), so to use it would be a circular reference.

I thank you for your efforts. I'm genuinely curious as to exactly where this accident happens and would be quite happy if someone solves the mystery. But wanted to point out there is an error in the logic used in your edit summary for moving the co-ordinates. Dave (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]