User talk:1234comrade

January 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hare Krishna Konar have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hare Krishna Konar was changed by 1234comrade (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962319 on 2022-01-21T13:48:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, 1234comrade, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Hare Krishna Konar seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 14:15, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your appreciation. - Chandan Guha (talk) 10:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome Mr. Chandan Guha 1234comrade (talk) 12:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communist Consolidation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Consolidation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello 1234comrade! Your additions to Hare Krishna Konar have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Shripad Amrit Dange into Hare Krishna Konar. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 04:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Your edit to Communist Consolidation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communist Party of India (Marxist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another copyright violation at Communist Consolidation

Your edit to Communist Consolidation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hare Krishna Konar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— DaxServer (t · m · c) 07:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Communist Party of India (Marxist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muzaffar Ahmed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hannan Mollah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sultan Ahmed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Communist Party of India (Marxist). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--Mariam57 (talk) 07:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for revert the page thanks Partha protim konar (talk) 08:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/1234comrade. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 01:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for revert the CPI(M) page for many time. I was reverting because a editor was removing that. So that the wiki visitors get the perfect information from wikipages so for that reason was reverting it continuously. Sorry for that please unblock me. Thank you 1234comrade (talk) 05:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I am sorry for editing like this thanks 1234comrade (talk) 04:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Please unblock me 1234comrade (talk) 04:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1234comrade (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi administrators, Sorry I went into edit war and I also constantly adding list of founders in article of CPI(M) without providing adequate sources and also one of the user named Partha protim konar has suddenly removed my whole talk page, for that's why the administrators are thinking that Partha protim konar is my sockpuppet account but it is incorrect Partha protim konar is another user totally different from my edits, so please unblock me as I have the habit of edits in Wikipedia and i am giving faith to the administrators that in future i will provide adequate sources before editing. Do not ignore my request as i have an habits of edits in Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

I don't believe your refutation of sockpuppetry for even a second. Yamla (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reply

User:Yamla I am apologizing you and saying you to please believe me that User:Partha protim konar is not my sockpuppet account. You please believe me just one time if it happened again you will block me again. Please believe me. 1234comrade (talk) 15:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed sockpuppetry. This is one of the most conclusive set of technical evidence I've seen in my entire time as a checkuser. --Yamla (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1234comrade (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi the administrators are requested to unblock me as I realized my fault and please unblock me but if I again do any fault you will again block me, sorry for my fault just believe me I will not do any fault again.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Talk page access removed; request unblock from original account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1234comrade (talk) 16:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]