User talk:122.56.100.98

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 122.56.100.98, is registered to Global-Gateway Internet via Spark New Zealand - Lower Hutt, Wellington, New Zealand and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

March 2023

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:18, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. An edit that you recently made to Origin of speech seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Evolutionary linguistics may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

</ref> which strongly argued for an [[adaptationist] approach to language origins. Their paper is often credited{{by whom?}} with

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Line breaks

Hello, thanks for your useful copyedits on Wikipedia. However, please do not add extra line breaks to Wikipedia articles, as they make diffs (i.e. differences between two versions of articles) much harder to read. I have just spent several hours removing the gratuitous line breaks that you've added. If you continue this practice you will be blocked. Graham87 11:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Opening sentence

Hello. Just a reminder that the opening sentence of an article should be just that: a sentence. Not sure why you'd want to remove verb and relative pronoun, as you did with this edit, converting the sentence to a list of phrases, but I don't think it's particularly constructive. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And please ignore the above... Your changed wording clearly is a sentence, and the problem lay with my failure to read it as such because its structure differed from the basic WP:BETTER#Lead section-style opening sentence. Sorry. Struway2 (talk) 10:10, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Junior dos Santos may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| [Mark Hunt]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:25, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of sport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

wrestling | sumo-wrestling]] competition from the [[Heian period|Heian]] or [[Kamakura period]] (between 794 and 1333]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Culture of Cuba may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

which could lead to domestic violence. It has been said{{by whom?}} in many{{quantify}} sources{{which?}] that the economic conditions in Cuba affect relationships within marriages. However, studies show

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Circassians may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

place in Egyptian society. It constitutes Egypt's largest family and largest [[Abazin]] minority.)
|''Натыхъуай'' {{IPA-ady|natəχʷaːj|}}, ''Наткъуадж'' {{IPA-ady|natəχʷaːd͡ʒ|}})

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:34, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Philosophy of history may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Roncevaux Pass]] 9778) during [[Charlemagne]]'s first campaign to conquer the [[Iberian peninsula]]).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Baba O'Riley has been reverted.
Your edit here to Baba O'Riley was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZwOq0tTEPE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

July 2016

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Arthur Dudley Dobson. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sro23 (talk) 04:48, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Panther edit

Hi there. Your edit was of a major scope, so it does desrve discussion by other contributors. Please comment at the panther talk page. It is also useful for others to give a brief note on the edit summary bar. Please do not revert but discuss those points in the article talkpage. Please read WP:BRD and [WP:CONSENSUS]]. Regards, Irondome (talk) 02:15, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Marvellous Spider-Man. An edit you recently made to SplitFire spark plug seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marvellous Spider-Man 04:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Isabella Beeton

Please do not tag featured articles, as you did on the above. If you have a problem, go to the talk page where I'm sure someone will answer your queries. I have reverted you. Oh, and your grammatical fixes too were highly questionable. Cassianto ^Talk 07:21, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm XenonNSMB. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Trans-Pacific Partnership— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 03:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in The Go-Betweens, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 21:52, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Poetry, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 07:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Kpgjhpjm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ernst Plischke have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Kpg jhp jm 01:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I can see no reason for this notice and the reversion and in a perfect world I think that Kpgjhpjm would probably acknowledge this and apologize. Since, 122.56.100.98, you are clearly making good edits (my attention was drawn by your useful addition of the quotes about Philip Pullman) why don't you just get an account and perhaps encounter fewer incidents of this sort. You also get other useful benefits like a Watch List. I know you shouldn't have to get an account and you've probably thought about it before and all the rest of it ... I just wanted to mention it again in case a nudge might help. I am quite prepared to be rebuffed! Cheers DBaK (talk) 08:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - wolf 09:09, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018

Indeed, this is one of the public computers available via the Lower Hutt library system at Petone, Lower Hutt, Naenae, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.56.100.98 (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

|}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.