User talk:121.99.108.78

August 2017

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Alan Sugar, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NaturalEventHurricane has been accepted

NaturalEventHurricane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 22:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 121.99.108.78. You have new messages at Master of Time's talk page.
Message added 03:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Master of Time (talk) 03:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 121.99.108.78! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:05, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump

Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:List of lawyers willing to represent Donald Trump during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 10:53, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 121.99.108.78. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Upsidedown Keyboard (talk) 15:23, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 121.99.108.78. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 12:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, 121.99.108.78. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 22:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi 121.99.108.78! You created a thread called What are Portals and why are editors requesting moves one at a time when the general "move all Portals" failed consensus? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Islamic military jurisprudence—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:33, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Materialscientist What!, my edit was contructive, made sense and follows what the guidance of Mohammed, you quick undo, does not make sense and is very unproductive, please explain.121.99.108.78 (talk) 13:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NaturalEventHurricane

Template:NaturalEventHurricane has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Guy (help! - typo?) 23:17, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:JzG. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 01:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Is Genesis History?

Please explain civily what you would like to change exactly at Talk:Is Genesis History?. I read your edit summary but it wasn't very clear. The article is short and has no criticism subsection. It was also unclear why you removed "myth". Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 01:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neonate Hi Neo, I was trying to structure it like other movies and have a reception section, for criticisms etc and to allow easy additions to this section and easy scan of the article. I did not remove myth, in fact I added Creation Myth and also "fundamental" as both seem very relevant. I was also going to add google review, not sure I should though, fyi 27 reviews (as at today) 24 5 star and 3 1 star, divided by believers of myth and people that view science as a discipline, so not "real" commentary there. Again, my reasoning was it needs to be structured as per the bulk of all movie articles and we do need to have a "reception" or such section., please copy to article talk page if warranted121.99.108.78 (talk) 03:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.