User talk:121.102.47.215

January 2010

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kennet Andersson. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tomas e (talk) 15:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Nordic race has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Gage (talk) 08:31, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Race edits

Please stop adding your assertion that members of the Nordic race have "relatively short arms". If you have a source for this claim, please provide it, but do not add it to the table, since this is a verbatim quotation from Ripley's The Races of Europe, which says no such thing. Paul B (talk) 09:04, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Marfan syndrome. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Connormah (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop inserting unreferenced information into List of rail gauges

Hi,

Your edits to this article have been reverted on multiple occasions by multiple editors. Either cite reliable references, or stop inserting this highly dubious information.

And please cease and desist from inserting the same text into the talk pages of everyone who reverts your edits. In this context is irrelevant nonsense.

Zzrbiker (talk) 12:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Mjroots (talk) 12:51, 26 February 2010 (UTC) (Admin)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to List of rail gauges. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 13:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at List of rail gauges

You've been reported for edit warring at WP:AN3#User:121.102.47.215 reported by User:Oknazevad (Result: ). If you respond there and promise to stop reverting, you may be able to avoid a block. EdJohnston (talk) 14:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at List of rail gauges. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:121.102.47.215 reported by User:Oknazevad (Result: 31h). EdJohnston (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. –Signalhead ^< T > 13:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop inserting unreferenced information into assorted rail articles

Other editors will sometimes make the effort to verify and find supporting sources after interesting facts are added to articles, but the author really should do it. Please get serious about helping the project! You are adding interesting unsourced facts to assorted rail articles at such a manic pace that the effect is disruptive.

After researching a sample of your new information, I'm inclined to revert the bulk of your writing on rail topics as not credible. Also, when you change the meaning of sourced text while leaving the existing citation in place, please explain why.
Prari (talk) 14:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

British Rail Class 373

This edit was unhelpful and has been reverted. For your previous edit to British Rail Class 373, an interesting change to the power specification, you need to cite a reliable source.
Prari (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:High-speed rail, you will be blocked for vandalism. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 08:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Talk:High Speed 2, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tmol42 (talk) 15:02, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.