User talk:117.194.134.78
Hi, instead of pinging random users on the talk page, you can just edit the article yourself to include that information, paying attention to including reliable sources, and maintaining a neutral POV. —Matrix(!) ping onewhen replying {u - t? - uselessc} 11:36, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. Thanks for your message. I pinged those four people cuz a cursory look over the history of the article revealed these were four of those who had edited the article over the last 1.5 years plus. One of them is an admin and the other three are editors with higher privileges. It is my opinion that the hindenburg allegations section is not NPOV. Anyway I have the most reliable sources to back up my addition. When I posted on the Talk page Ratnahastin removed my piece with no discussion or even explanation but instead a false allegation. And when I restored, Capitals00 has again removed the same, again with no explanation whatsoever. To be honest it looks like a case of "not liking it" rather than verifiability or pertinence or pov. Please kindly look into this once. 117.194.134.78 (talk) 13:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
I've boldly removed your comment at WP:AIV since that isn't the correct venue to report a well-established editor, and is only for obvious spammers and vandals. Please take your report to WP:ANI instead. Thanks! CycloneYoris talk! 11:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. Yes I had posted on ANI also. I also posted on AIV as I was not sure where to post. A very well-referenced bit which I could have added to the article as its unprotected, but still chose to at least talk once on the Talk page, was reverted with zero discussion or even explanation but instead and allegation. I have added it to the article. Could you also kindly take a look? Thanks 117.194.134.78 (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]Your recent editing history at Adani Group shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please don't edit war to restore your preferred version. This is frowned upon. IP, don't threaten other editors that you are going to take them to Admins, in order to keep your preferred version. Codename AD talk 20:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Izno (talk) 05:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |