Jump to content

User talk:110.224.41.250

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Final words: Wikipedia is biased, one-sided, unsupportive and a non-collaborative editing environment where issues go unaddressed, a reason for a somewhat trigger happy "experienced users" to block new/unexperienced users without any basis or going through the diffs, facts and unlimited accusations, that are unfortunately harder to overcome. Goodbye, and cheers for scaring away the newbies like that. I won't learn anymore policies, procedures aren't followed here as exactly envisioned. Bye forever and go ahead without any good faith editors. ---110.224.41.250 (talk) 13:32, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blanked per another policy you've created Wp:Blanking. No unblock requests, in this specified time range/period were submitted. Admin abuse free to float here. Unexplained blocks, Violation of Wp:Admin accountability. I've no more words to say and keep digging more policies/guidelines /essays etc. Thanks for the harassment --110.224.41.250 (talk) 13:32, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since you replied to me: Firstly I made no assumption of good or bad faith. That said, you left an entirely unnecessary message on Flooded with them hundreds' talk page. It's entirely unnecessary because the user page already has a link to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Zawl which includes User:SquishyLad. The tone of the message was also inappropriate; FWTH is already about as banned as can be, and shouting that he should be banned more and that his socks should be blocked serves no purpose. It's not as if his latest sockpuppet hadn't been blocked, well before you became involved. The only conceivable purpose that I can see is to further antagonize and alienate the banned editor, that is, to troll and to harass him. When a more experienced editor removed your comments, you replaced them, which of course still served no purpose. Then came this edit. It's not as if FWTH doesn't know what a ban means, and it's not as if we double-ban people, so pointing out WP:3X to an already-banned editor is pointless. you'll regret it once the notice is handed out by community "No longer welcome here". - as you're well aware, that notice had already been handed out before that account was even created. So there's again no point to any of that except to further antagonize the banned editor. This is just plain nonsense; there is no "second layer of bans". So none of your numerous comments on blocked editors' talk pages served any beneficial purpose, and that was explained to you more than once. If you weren't trolling or trying to harass an already-banned editor, then I have to conclude that you got yourself involved in an area far beyond your level of experience or competence and were unreceptive to guidance. I consider that unlikely; FWTH and Orangemoody aren't quite obvious topics for a newcomer to find, and finding WP:RFPP to respond to a discussion of which you weren't notified is also not quite what I'd expect of a genuinely new editor. Either way, your editing was disruptive and wasted other editors' time, with no indication that you'd stop on your own. Huon (talk) 22:38, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]