User talk:109.79.73.178

October 2022

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you recently removed content from Serenity Prayer without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 17:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I clearly explained in my edit summary that an accusation of plagiarism needed to be reliably sourced. -- 109.79.73.178 (talk) 18:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

I see that the text has been clarified and the directly attributed to someone. That's a distinct improvement (irrespective of my lack of direct WP:SOURCEACCESS this further explanation ultimately makes the article better for readers.) -- 109.79.73.178 (talk) 18:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

You didn't read the source yet you removed content, not knowing if it is in the source?? Could you explain why? Additionally, your edit summary is: "It is libelous to make accusation of plagiarism, it is not clear (and it needs to be clear first) that this translation rises to a false claim of original authorship". Which part of that "clearly explains that an accusation of plagiarism needed to be reliably sourced"? Sundayclose (talk) 18:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

WP:SDEXAMPLES

I've read WP:SDEXAMPLES. How do you feel that "1995 film by Iain Softley" applies to it and "1995 American crime film" doesn't? Dan Bloch (talk) 00:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

---