User talk:109.78.199.36

December 2021

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cryptozoo—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 10:34, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

What part of adding a review from Variety magazine did you think was not constructive? Did you even read the diff? -- 109.78.199.36 (talk) 10:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

I see now the editor with automated rollback tools reverted not one but two of my edits. Please do not put so much trust in the automated tools and try to remember WP:PRESERVE.

If you read the diffs you can see that in the first edit I removed a non notable critic (spam or added in good faith it doesn't belong either way, it seems to be WP:SELFPUB film film blog) and added a review from the industry trade paper Variety, which is about the most notable film publication there is and it is extremely unlikely that anyone would have any real objection to including it in a film article. -- 109.78.199.36 (talk) 10:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi there. I apologise for reverting your edits so quickly. I had a lapse in judgement and did not notice the remainder of your edits. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 10:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I understand there's a lot of spam and vandalism to deal with but this overcorrection happens a lot more than it should. -- 109.78.199.36 (talk) 10:56, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

---