User talk:109.29.22.222

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 109.29.22.222, is registered to SFR and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

February 2014

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing parentheses

Please stop removing parentheses from the authors given behind species. Those parentheses have a specific meaning in taxonomy. Thanks. -- Yzx (talk) 23:23, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Antennarius may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

''[[Antennarius pauciradiatus]]'' [[Leonard Peter Schultz|L. P. Schultz]], 1957 - [[dwarf frogfish)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Garrick's catshark. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please seek to improve the article in question rather than removing templates. The copyright violation still exists. --Animalparty-- (talk) 22:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Cut-and-paste

Please stop using cut-and-paste methods to change the names of articles. Instead of turning an article into a redirect and pasting the text from the article into the former redirect to achieve the renaming, you must create an account, and then use the "Move" tab to rename the article. Abductive (reasoning) 03:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Xenacanthidae may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Image:Expleuracanthus1DB.jpg|thumb|left|200px|''[[Expleuracanthus|Xenacanthus]]''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:52, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aetomylaeus may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Waldhorn. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Cladoselache without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Waldhorn (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia or make nonconstructive changes, as you did at Houndshark, you may be blocked from editing. Other users have found your edits to be disruptive and have also reverted some of your changes. In fact, there is no reason at all why you should be removing any of that information. If you don't stop your disruptive behavior, you will lose your editing privileges. 72.197.234.162 (talk) 23:04, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Edit Summaries

While I'm glad that you have begun using edit summaries to explain your motives (which you should almost, always do), please refrain from deleting information elsewhere without providing a clear explanation and/or a reliable source that supports what you are adding/removing. Thank you. 72.197.234.162 (talk) 05:01, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you are constantly blanking and redirecting these pages

Please. Tutelary (talk) 21:42, 28 August 2014 (UTC) I redirect these pages because these sharks are no longer valid species.[reply]

Under what standard/new information is this the case? Tutelary (talk) 21:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is IP_editor_continuing_to_blank_and_redirect_pages. Thank you. Tutelary (talk) 23:09, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Photonectes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* ''[[Photonectes braueri]]'' [[Erich Zugmayer|Zugmayer]], 1913) (Brauer's dragonfish)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Devario may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* ''[[Devario salmonata]]'' [[Maurice Kottelat|Kottelat]], 2000)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:59, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Corydoras, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:53, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm This lousy T-shirt. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Eviota because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 19:37, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Tanakia. Neil916 (Talk) 18:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eptatretus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* ''[[Eptatretus stoutii]]'' [[William Neale Lockington|Lockington]], 1878) (Pacific hagfish)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Gerhardvalentin (talk) 14:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You have been told repeatedly not to remove parentheses from the authorities of scientific names. Any further unconstructive edit of this kind will result in your being blocked from editing. --Stemonitis (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Stemonitis (talk) 17:04, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Parentheses around the scientific authority

Please refer to the talk page for Planonasus (talk · contribs), in the section titled "Parentheses around the scientific authority". here is a link. Your efforts to improve articles is appreciated, but you have been continuing to remove the parentheses, which is harming, rather than improving, the articles. Please engage in discussion there, here, or somewhere else if you dispute what people are telling you or if you have questions or concerns. Please do it now, because if you continue making these changes, I or others are going to request a block of your editing privileges to prevent further harm. Neil916 (Talk) 21:14, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this ^^^^ before editing the Hypostomus article again. Neil916 (Talk) 20:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Phyllopteryx does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 20:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Please explain on the Talk:Phyllopteryx & Talk:Ruby seadragon pages why you are downgrading citations for those respective articles. Peaceray (talk) 21:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phyllopteryx. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. No text in summary, no discussion on talk page. You are in an edit war, pure & simple. Peaceray (talk) 22:07, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Ruby seadragon. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. You put no text in the summary & you have failed to discuss this on the talk page. You are promulgating an edit war, pure & simple. Peaceray (talk) 22:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2015

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Nurse shark with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. Do not remove parentheses from scientific authorities, as you did in this edit. You have been warned previously about this kind of damage to articles; any further infringements may result in an immediate block. --Stemonitis (talk) 10:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Stemonitis (talk) 18:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Hi,

I reverted your edit since most species do seem to be members of the superorder Selachimorpha. Natuur12 (talk) 16:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, my bad. Seems like I made a mistake. Apologies and won't happen again. Natuur12 (talk) 18:01, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Crenicichla. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 62.107.192.140 (talk) 08:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Pterois, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 00:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Pterois. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 03:10, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Image size in infoboxes

I see you are dedicating significant effort to re-sizing images in infoboxes. Please do not do that. There are defaults in place, both in general and user-selected, which should determine these image sizes. What looks good on your computer screen may be a garbled mess on someone else's when you force an image size to a particular pixel width. Please read WP:IMAGESIZE for the overall principles. See also Template:Taxobox#Images for discussion about specific use inside taxoboxes. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 03:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Leptoderma. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
You have been warned about your edits repeatedly before (here and in your Planonasus account). FishBase remains the main taxonomic resource for fishes (see WikiProject Fishes) and even when there are taxonomic updates, it remains the main citation for most of the list in almost all cases. For example, in Leptoderma, FishBase remains the citation for 5 species in the list. Only 1 species, Leptoderma ospesca, has another citation. Removing citations that form the basis for an article, even if only a part of it, is vandalism.
Separately, I have noticed that you consistently put in a space between sentences and citations. There should not be a space between these (see MOS:REFPUNC). In other words:

This is a sentence. <citations> – incorrect, space between sentence and citations

This is a sentence.<citation> – correct, no space between sentence and citation.

I have now corrected Leptoderma, leaving both citations that were used for the article, but removing the space. You have some good edits and I hope you continue with those, but your disregard for various rules, removal of citation (+information, in several cases) and occasional repeated reverts are highly problematic. Please do not continue with this or both your accounts may be blocked (as has happened before). 62.107.219.18 (talk) 22:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edits you made to Phyllopteryx & Ruby seadragon, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop degrading citations. Wikipedia does not use the same standards or format as scientific papers. Please refrain from removing valid parameters from citation templates & replacing them with parameters that hold less information. Peaceray (talk) 23:05, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Johann Anton Güldenstädt, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:35, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Dasyatis, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Eviota— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 21:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC). Sorry Shellwood, its an inadvertent error.[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.