Jump to content

User talk:108.49.240.77

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2024

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
why? 108.49.240.77 (talk) 01:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Why was I blocked?

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

108.49.240.77 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Someone please explain, I only vandalized 1 article 108.49.240.77 (talk) 01:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

And you're only blocked 1 month. Seems fair. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

108.49.240.77 (talk) 01:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, you vandalized two articles a total of four times. And then you insulted another editor and posted absolute nonsense to the Teahouse. You're free to claim you have no idea why you're blocked, but given how blatant your vandalism was, all that will do is convince any administrator that the block was necessary. If you have a serious interest in productively editing Wikipedia and leaving the grade school antics behind, you should read WP:GAB and rewrite your request in a manner in which an admin would at least give it consideration. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 03:54, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention this probably isn't their first time making edits like this. The page they chose to vandalize, Sharon Green Middleton, has been targeted by the same racist, Massachusetts-based vandal for almost a year now on both Wikimedia and Wikipedia. Whenever I reverted their edits, they usually left messages on my talk page calling me slurs and encouraging me to kill myself. On one editor's page, this vandal even doxxed the editor's family because they reverted this editor's vandalism. Middleton's page just came off a three-month page protection because of this vandalism, and I have little doubt that it'll go back to being protected again soon. Y2hyaXM (talk) 14:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]