User talk:108.26.243.70

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 108.26.243.70, is registered to Verizon Business, a mobile phone provider, and is used by many of its customers, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Administrators may want to consider using a range block as cellular IPs change frequently. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

December 2023

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 02:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Allah, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 03:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Allah. Moons of Io (talk) 04:17, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Etymology

The material is for inclusion into the section Etymology under the Allah article 108.26.243.70 (talk) 03:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should actually readthat section of the article, which already covers everything you've asserted on the Talk page that is sourced. General Ization ^Talk 03:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Must have gotten confused on the article.

I remember reading that this interpretation of the origin of the word was discredited.

In any case this is not at the top of that section, and since it obviously seems to be the origin of the word it should be moved there. 108.26.243.70 (talk) 03:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I take the above back!

There is no mention of El or AL meaning God and Lah the name of the God!

I am proposing an addition to the article

Who is disrupting what?? 108.26.243.70 (talk) 04:19, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on China

Hello, you're clearly passionate about the subject of China's economy, and I think you have some good content to add, but you must familiarize yourself with how articles on Wikipedia should be written. The most minor of which is you're adding a lot of bare URL citations. More importantly, you need to avoid adding your own point of view, like the term "harassing" or "demographic crisis". Also, as pointed out in edit summaries, Wikipedia is not a newspaper nor should you be adding your own synthesis of the news. Unlike a news article, in Wikipedia, terms like "this year" or "recently" quickly become outdated and lose any reference to when it relates to. -- MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 17:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Day of the Lord. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 18:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't YOU start off on the talk page in order to express your objections? 108.26.243.70 (talk) 00:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm 210.3.136.74. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Day of the Lord have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 210.3.136.74 (talk) 02:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 210.3.136.74. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Day of the Lord have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 210.3.136.74 (talk) 02:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. R Prazeres (talk) 03:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Daniel 12:11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.

Start of with the fact that the Jews lost their temple after the Babylonian conquest around 600 BC and that days is a mis-translation of years in Daniel, what year do you get? and more importantly what was built on the Temple Mount on that year? 108.26.243.70 (talk) 03:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@108.26.243.70Please state that in the proper notice board. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 11:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

108.26.243.70 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What is borderline vandalism about my posts?

Decline reason:

You are not blocked for vandalism, you are blocked for disruptive editing, including edit warring and using spam links. Please specifically address these points. 331dot (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am asking for clarification of what about my posts constitute "vandalism" and what constitutes "Spam links". I see no difference in already existing mterial and my addition.108.26.243.70 (talk) 19:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explain to me what is the difference between this reference (already in the article)

In the biblical canon, the earliest, direct use of the phrase is in Isaiah 2: "For the day of the LORD of hosts shall be upon every one that is proud and lofty, and upon every one that is lifted up; and he shall be brought low" (Isaiah 2:12). Another early use of the phrase is in Amos 5:18-20.[4] Wright suggests that the phrase was already a standard one, and Amos' hearers would take it to mean "the day when Yahweh would intervene to put Israel at the head of the nations, irrespective of Israel's faithfulness to Him."[4] Yet Amos declares "Woe to you who long for the day of the LORD! Why do you long for the day of the LORD? That day will be darkness, not light" (Amos 5:18 NIV). Because Israel had sinned, God would come in judgement on them. Thus, the day of the Lord is about God chastening his people, whether it be through the Babylonian invasion of Jerusalem or a locust plague described in Joel 2:1–11.[4] Yet Joel 2:32 holds a promise that on the Day of the Lord, "everyone who calls on the name of the LORD will be saved."

and this reference (part of my addition)

According to Zechariah 14, the day of the lord will be a time when Jerusalem is captured. Zechariah 14.2 "I will gather all the nations to Jerusalem to fight against it; the city will be captured, the houses ransacked, and the women raped.", before the Lord takes action and strikes the attacking nations with a plague. Zechariah 14.12 "This is the plague with which the Lord will strike all the nations that fought against Jerusalem: Their flesh will rot while they are still standing on their feet, their eyes will rot in their sockets, and their tongues will rot in their mouths."`108.26.243.70 (talk) 14:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You placed your unblock request in a section header- edits should be placed in the larger edit window. You can avoid creating section headers entirely by clicking "edit" and not "add topic". 331dot (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.