Jump to content

User talk:104.202.165.231

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Gamaliel. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.--Imconfused3456talk 17:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of the change is unjustified because it modifies the article to make it more compatible with sectarian fundamentalist Christian views by concealing the fact which the note states, i.e. that Paul (at least the Paul we have) makes no claim at all to this relationship with Gamaliel. Acts is much later than Paul (even in fundamentalist opinion) and is largely hagiography, so a bald, unqualified citation of Acts, as if it were authoritative, is incompatible with wikipedia principles of neutral scholarship. 104.202.165.231 (talk) 20:57, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]