User talk:103.21.175.59

November 2022

Your recent editing history at Category:Articles with missing files shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dawnseeker2000 07:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023 question from Roland and Moonlight

Can you please let me now why you removed these categories from the article Roland in Moonlight?

Books about animals
Philosophy books
Metaphysics books
Epistemology books
Religious studies books

This book is clearly about all of these topics and is written in the long-standing dialog form of many other philosophical text. --Jjhake (talk) 03:12, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Continued unhelpful edits at Roland and Moonlight with no response

Please respond on the article talk page for Roland in Moonlight where I have explained how your edits are unhelpful in my view. Jjhake (talk) 11:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are reasons for my edits. Your edits are crap. 103.21.175.59 (talk) 23:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop personal attacking, I will look into this and have a try for improving it ASAP. Lemonaka (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have not improved the aricle. You have just blindly reverted a reasonable edit. 103.21.175.59 (talk) 09:49, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Roland in Moonlight. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Lemonaka (talk) 23:44, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The editor knows f**k all about editing WP. 103.21.175.59 (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Take a deep breath, get some cookies, be cool when you come back Lemonaka (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That does nothing to fix the systemic problems inherent in WP. 103.21.175.59 (talk) 23:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need to have flagged revs thoughout. 103.21.175.59 (talk) 23:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:BRD which is a normal dispute solution. For complicated one, please go to wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard Lemonaka (talk) 23:56, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Better still get rid of the useless editors!!! 103.21.175.59 (talk) 09:47, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Now (newspaper), you may be blocked from editing. There is a reference, so no ref should not be your rationale. Lemonaka (talk) 13:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Category:American memoirs. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Lemonaka (talk) 13:04, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.