User talk:100.14.29.248

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
December 2016 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page. If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. I need to keep Nicole Mandich because I created her. I will add resources where I got it from. Please let me edit her so I can add those resources, please! January 2017 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. April 2017 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 100.14.29.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Why did you block me? I didn't do any block evasions at all. No redirects, nothing. I used only put citations to reliable sources in the articles I edited. Please unblock me! 100.14.29.248 (talk) 20:16, 27 April 2017 (UTC)100.14.29.24 Decline reason: This IP continues to be used for block evasion and will not be unblocked.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 100.14.29.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Why? Please explain me why you blocked me? I didn't do anything. Please tell me what contribution I did that caused me to be blocked? It was an accident. It linked me to the wrong link. This is why I changed it. Decline reason: This IP is used by blocked User:Alma Fordy to evade their block. For that reason it cannot be unblocked. Huon (talk) 20:31, 27 April 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). 100.14.29.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: This IP address used to be used by Alma Fordy, but now it doesn't. It is now used independently. Just please unblock me. 100.14.29.248 (talk) 20:33, 27 April 2017 (UTC) Decline reason: Evidently not true. Favonian (talk) 20:50, 27 April 2017 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---