User talk:1.144.108.75

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Killarney Heights High School has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Killarney Heights High School was changed by 1.144.108.75 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969193 on 2018-05-03T01:29:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:29, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent additions to Day of the Year articles

Hi 1.144.108.75,

I noticed that you reverted my reversion of your edits. As several other editors, including myself, have explained in edit summaries, all additions to Day of the Year articles must have a direct source, per this guideline. I have reverted your edits again because of this, but they look constructive otherwise. Please don't revert again without finding references for your additions (for one thing, doing so would constitute edit warring)-- you might find this tutorial helpful in adding them. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page. Thanks! aboideau^talk 17:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. creffett (talk) 18:56, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sasquatch t|c 19:00, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.