User talk:0xSkyy

0xSkyy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 0xSkyy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 17:15, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

November 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Xiaomi Mi Pad, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". making significant edits, adding things and such marked as "minor". Graywalls (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

@Graywalls:, thanks for your suggestion(s), but if you might look closely, I did not mark all edits as "minor",

• where I changed content "significantly", I DID NOT mark the edit as minor,
• where I added citations, those were the edits I marked as minor ( and not even for all of them ), citations that I forgot to add with content, were added as minor.

0xSkyy (talk) 17:24, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

See Help:Minor_edit#When_not_to_mark_as_minor_changes. References and links added can absolutely be the subject of disagreement. Graywalls (talk) 00:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

@Graywalls:, Yes, obviously, links can be subject of disagreement, however my edits were not fragmented by edits from other users. As I wrote earlier:

where I added citations, those were the edits I marked as minor ( and not even for all of them ), citations that I forgot to add with content, were added as minor.

The main purpose of "minor" marking (I assume), is for notification system (politically whatever it may be), with each non-minor edit generating a notification for the editor/watcher of a particular article, when creating several Contiguous edits, what I felt the responsible thing to do was to minimize spam notification, as the notification should have been generated for other prior and followup edits as well.

0xSkyy (talk) 02:58, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)