User talk:09aidepikiw/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

San Andreas Myths (again)

I still fail to see why my edits merit removal using your reasoning. They're not 'original research' or lies, they're right there in the freakin' game!! There are pictures of UFOs in the Lil Probe Inn! Don't believe me? Walk in there yourself if you have the game! Like I said, I wasn't trying to make the myths out to be true, just adding their info as myth references. The topic was talking about UFO references, and I merely added another one. That's all. I fail to see why the vague reference to Men in Black in the game or the radio station quotes can stay, but my little addition can't. How come neither of these examples lack citations, but they're still allowed in the paragraph? If you want citations for new references, then you should be able to add references to these other examples as well. If it's pictures, citations, or videos you want, I'll be more than happy to include them as backup. But as I said, add citations/sources to the other references if you feel the need to delete mine.

Speaking of which, I deleted the last sentence of the "Mysterious Map" paragraph because it was already included a little further up, but you re-added it. I've deleted it again, but look and you'll see the info is still in the paragraph. Thanks for your patience, adios.

Phanos012 18:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I read and understood your links just fine, thanks, but it's obvious you haven't read MY reply very well. I stated above that the other references to UFOs, such as the Men in Black and radio quotes, also lacked any citations whatsoever, yet you let them remain. So I'll ask again, how come you allow them to be in there if they don't have any citations? You're being hypocritical by letting them stay. As I said, I'll add citations if that's what you want, but you still have yet to do anything about the others. So until you add source citations to those as well, step off your high horse. Phanos012 19:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

For the last time, I didn't make this stuff up by myself, it is right there in the friggin game!!! So please stop it with that BS, I don't need you calling me a liar just because you haven't actually looked into this yourself. I know what original research is, so DON'T give me anymore links. What I'm saying is my info IS sourceable and that you're being a hypocrite by letting un-sourced info stay. I kept adding it because it was relevant and credible information and hadn't been included yet! I'm not introducing or reworking the stupid theory. I don't know what's so hard for you to grasp about that.

And for the last time, stop putting that freaking sentence back in the "Mysterious Map" paragraph! That same sentence is already located in that same paragraph a little higher up! Why do you think I keep deleting it? Don't believe me, just look at it! How do you expect me to take you seriously if you can't even read?? Phanos012 19:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

And don't mess with my talk page. I'll remove the personal attacks, not you. Thanks. Phanos012 21:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Kay

Okay. I understand. But we do have enough information to build a stub article. When we get more and more info, we can keep building on to it until it is about as big as the Lance Vance or Ken Rosenberg articles. --Jimbo Herndan 01:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

NO...Also don't remove continet from your talk page that is vandlizum (learned that from you)69.205.61.185 00:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I removed this edit as it was a blatant personal attack. Please see WP:NPA and WP:RPA. Removal of vandalism is not in fact vandalism. Have a nice day! Madman bum and angel 00:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Exactly. 'Preciate that. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 00:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Stay away from me!!! I don't know you! LAcfm 20:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

sorry but its true you are a sock puppet!04:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Riddick

Hey bud, what else should we fix for the The Chronicles of Riddick Article? I'll start linking text in the new plot section soon.

If you have any ideas feel free to share =) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bilalc (talk • contribs) 03:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC).

You want to shorten the Plot section even more? I've already rewritten it to 1/3 of what i wrote before... I hesitate to do so again, the star wars entry seems bigger than ours...

Thanks. Is the person who wrote the original plot entry still around? I'm wondering if there was anything he/she wanted to keep from the original article. Bilalc 04:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

yes your Bishoptutu04:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Leave me alone! LAcfm 04:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

YOU BETTER STAY AWAY FROM ME!! LAcfm 02:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

sockpuppet huh?

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Also please do not dleate tampletes. And this tamplete is not missused! I kindly wanted to be a friendly fellow wikipedian but no you had to go far and make fun of me for no resion! What so ever!--Tommy Montana Thats it keep calling me a sock puppet! Thats it I had it with you im bringing a admin to check this out!

I don't understand what you ment by editing warring? Wikipedia dosen't run out on editing dose it? Or are you talking about Los Cabrones in the list of GTA gangs? Also id like to point out I dleated your warning because you used it wrong and also because im playing your game. Don't even say thats personal attack warn me or anything i'm still geting at lest 2 Admin to check this out. I'll be looking forward of hearing from you.--Tommy Montana 23:41, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

I'll stop screwing around when you do. What about the time you were disruptive? huh? Oh i'll be blocked alright when I assured the two Admin how this started. All this whould't of happend if you just stoped calling me a sockpuppet and vandlizing my page!--Tommy Montana 00:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

I tryed to be nice with you but you just chouldn't stop chouldn't you? I TOLD YOU FOR THE LAST TIME TO NOT CALL ME A SOCKPUPPET, DO NOT CALL ME BUTTERRUM ETHER I'M NOT BUTTERRUM OK I TOLD YOU DIDN'T I ILL GET A ADMIN TO SHOW YOU THE ROPES!--Tommy Montana 04:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Revenge? - Hah! This isn't revenge this is about geting you to calm down your freaking me out! You keep calling me Butterrum??? You keep harrasing me by calling me a sockpuppet, And now your vandlizing my pages and puting a so called count on me!?--Tommy Montana 04:54, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Howed you like that then? Huh Mr.Klyptzm! I will stop when you stop calling me these ugly words and stop following me this is geting very heavy! I called you pesty vandle because you called me a Sockpuppet I wanna play with fire and yours to! To make a point.--The World Chico and everything in it 05:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

I've finally had some time to look this over, and I've blocked Tommy as a sock account at this time. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

GTA Task force.

I have started the task force here. You've been added to the Participants list just like you asked. .:Alex:. 12:44, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

recent wp:aiv report

Hi, Klptyzm. You recently reported User:86.137.133.254 as a sockpuppet, but if you look closely at that user's talk page edit, they didn't sign as Butterrum, they just pressed the return key a couple of times before that user's signature. And that IP doesn't appear to have vandalized anything. So, please try to be less presumptive about calling people sockpuppets. Thanks, — coelacan — 04:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

hello

Two things, what does Klptzm mean, and are all editors as controversial as you? 218.186.9.1 07:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

answer to "What do you mean by contraversal?"

People are constantly acusing you of things. What does your name mean? (That is a direct question, which should be answered by you)

218.186.9.1 13:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

I don't know who you're talking about, but I heard about you. You best leave me alone!!!

I don't know who you're talking about, but I heard about you. You best leave me alone!!! if you are talking to me (218.186.9.1), and you are Klyptzm, when did i gain some sort of notority? and when was asking what someone's name means and why they are controversial some sort of offence that requires a stern warning and a laughable message about leaving someone alone? 218.186.9.1 02:20, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Check the edit history by clicking history at the top of the page. That's not me; that's someone who doesn't understand the concept of leaving new messages at the bottom of pages, along with an section header. You didn't bother me by your message, by the way. I completely understand why you asked that. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 02:55, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing that up. How is it that that person didn't sign their post? 218.186.9.1 03:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Basically, he doesn't know how to follow instructions, or rules for that matter. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 05:10, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

I mean, doesn't that bot put the "The preceding unsigned comment was added by IP/Username(talk) 00:00, 01 January 2007 (UTC)" after any unsigned comments? 218.186.9.1 13:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Depends on if it's "around" or not, so to speak. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 17:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me

Why are you so mean to people? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.217.39.122 (talk) 23:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC).

Like i would listen to you, you are a loony dickhead who reverts everyone's edits, :Alex: too.

Stay away from me you queer!! VidGmr 05:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Why the fuck are you stalking me!?!?! FUCK OFF MOTHERFUCKER!!! VidGmr 05:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Stay away from me!!! VidGmr 05:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

VidGmr: The following is taken from the Cyberstalking Wikipedia page: " Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk someone. This term is used interchangeably with online harassment and online abuse". Technically, this makes you the Cyberstalker. 218.186.9.1 13:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Is this you?

Is this your previous username? Why were you blocked from editing Wikipedia? 218.186.9.1 11:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Did anyone tell you to go fuck yourself!? VidGmr 22:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

No, no one has. Did anyone ever tell you that a) exclamation marks and question marks should not be put together and b) that you are a nice person who deserves an award for being such a great citizen? Judging by the comment that I am answering, I would bet money that no one has ever said either of those two things to you. I would also bet that you are around 11 years old. Now I think that it is way past your bed time, you have school tomorrow! 218.186.9.1 11:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

User:VidGmr

You're better off taking this to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets. --w^{L<speak·check>} 22:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

heh heh heh

you make it sound like i am some kind of washed up private investigator, shooting at shadows, leaving no stone unturned, scrutinising every detail while failing to see the big picture staring them right in the face. 218.186.9.1 13:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello!

Yo my name is Barney_Johnson, i've just compleated the article on Mrs. Euphegenia Doubtfire, if you would like to help on the article, like adding a picture, feel free to do so! Barney Johnson 05:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Just a friendly reminder to use an edit summary when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! Oo7565 18:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean by that?--Manny Ribera 06:13, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

User:VidGmr

Don't get people mad at you Kyptzm! It can be a bad thing for you and me! Well I just wanted to say stop with this nonsense! This is not a threat of any kind just to tell you to stop! Notice how I did not use warning templates, thats because i'm a man enough to not use them in this situation. But I will use them if you continue to vandlize and or call people bastard or any such words similar with threats!--Manny Ribera 14:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Also I wanna bring up Be polite, Assume good faith, No personal attacks and Be welcoming!--Manny Ribera 14:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello!

I've just started the Mc daddy page! And we could use you're help on it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Barney Johnson (talk • contribs) 22:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC).

I deleted the page that he's talking about because it was nonsense. Academic Challenger 22:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

• I guess it's possible that it's a bot, but it could just as well be a teenager playing around. Academic Challenger 00:45, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

And let me know if you see anything else from him. If he continues to make bad edits I will block. Academic Challenger 00:46, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Jyggalag?

You removed my section about Jyggalag in the article about Daedric Princes, and I subsequently made this argument about why he should be included in the article, which I put in the talk page of that article.

Jyggalag is, as of the Shivering Isles, a separate entity from Sheogorath, who was not killed, simply freed from the curse placed upon him by the other Princes. For this reason, he deserves to be listed. Dantheman102100 20:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

BTW, I've played (and am addicted to) both TES4 Oblivion and the Shivering Isles, and learned of this through those games. I am not just some peon who got this from some fansite. :)Dantheman102100 20:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Guess what

I'm not leaving. You can. Say how many people now hate you on Wikipedia? Barney Johnson 08:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Screw you

Stop acting like a fucking Admin. Something tells me that you're trying to become admin so you can get revenge on people like me? Sean mc Sean 08:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

What's up with the personal attacks? Not in keeping with WP principles.—Gaff ^ταλκ 08:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Klyptzm deserves being sworn at! He starts everything! I tryed to be nice with him but he acts sooo immature! I never used this very ugly word but it's true!--Manny Ribera 14:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

What have you done?!

Everyones attacking you know even the bots are attacking!--Manny Ribera 13:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Wow I take that back lots of people hate you now, Butterrum, Liberty City's Miguel, a few IPs, VidGmr, Craxy and alot more etc. etc.! Again what did you do to start WWIII--Manny Ribera 13:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Here you might wanna read this so you know what to do in a bad situation. Cool down blocks—brief blocks solely for the purpose of "cooling down" an angry user—should not be used, as they inevitably serve to inflame the situation. So it is best to just talk to the user who is angry the resion you have enemies is this resion just so you know! Also calling me a puppet makes me feel offended and is a personal attack please stop! Thank you for your help!--Manny Ribera 14:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

F.Y. stands for "FUCK YOU" dumb ass! LAcfm 23:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Don't call me a PUPPET OK!!! That is a PERSONAL ATTACK!--Manny Ribera 10:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

You really think this is a game?! No Don't make fun or attack anyone next time I wont be a nice guy and have to enforce using warning templates! So PLEASE STOP NOW!--Manny Ribera 11:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I think you gotten loco!? I am not Butterrum! My name is Manny and I am here to tell you 2 words! Please stop! Because i'm such a nice guy i'll not use the warnings so Please Stop!--Manny Ribera 14:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Not now you aren't but you keep calling me Butterrum? Whys that?--Manny Ribera 14:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

You Have No Place On This Website

I've read many other comments posted by you, and I am deeply insulted not just for me but for several other members as well. How is it possible that you have not been some how forcibly removed from Wikipedia all together, because you really should be! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aboddie6 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC).

THANK YOU! About time someone says that! Klyptzm is a nice person yes but hes sooo paranoid! He thinks everyone and everything is a sockpuppet! Please stop thiws Klyptzm i'm starting to get worried about you!--Manny Ribera 12:57, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

My Proof Is At vida'sworld.com page: 31...

If you check Vida's main website, vida'sworld.com, one out of a few that she answers personally to. You don't want me to make anymore changes to her wikisite fine, but I believe you're breaking a rule by putting up false information. After all, aren't we supposed to be posting valid info.? Check vida'sworld.com (forum opinion section of the forum index; page: #31-comment: #3), you'll see that I'm right.

Aboddie6 04:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I said what I said not to call you or anyone else a liar, but because false information was posted. I understand that people lie on the internet, but then again, I also understand that sometimes mistakes are made, and maybe that's what 1974 is, simply a mistake as opposed to a lie. My only real problem with you is your verbal attacks other members of wikipedia. I believe other rules include NOT verbal attacking others, and yet you have. Rules put aside though, I never did like people who felt it was okay to attack anyone else, verbally or otherwise, but at least you had the decency to post both of Vida's birthyears on her wikisite, so I give you brownie points for that.

Aboddie6 06:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Shop Boyz

A tag has been placed on Shop Boyz, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 22:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

(shrug) I'm not psychic--I can only assess an article based on what's there, not what's going to be there. All articles I speedy-tag remain on my watchlist until they're either deleted or the tag is removed, though. I'll keep an eye on it. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 22:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, since I don't spend all my time here, leaving the tag up means it's flagged for any admin to come have a look, and given the hangon tag and the amount of work that's been put in since, it should get a fair evaluation. But please don't hurt your case by referring to these guys as "up and coming". "Up and coming" usually equals "not notable yet", which in turn equals "not notable". If I had a dollar for all of the self-proclaimed "up and coming" bands who try and post articles here, I could retire. --Finngall ^talk 03:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

• Sorry, I agree with Finngall. Up-and-coming bands where the only source is their own MySpace are almost without exception deleted, and when such deletions are challenged they are almost always endorsed. Guy (Help!) 10:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

You may want to read this...

No, i'm here to argue with you, but rather something else to tell you... You know User:Craxy? And User:LAcfm? Yep, thats right, they're the same person. You know how i know this? Well, i decided to play a little prank on Craxy, i made a myspace account that i claimed to be your's, so i could see what Craxy would say, and he told me a lot of stuff, such as a plan to block you for revenge, and something more interesting about me... He told me that He was the one who had me blocked for 3 weeks, and that he set me up with all these personal attacks... Lastly he told me that he was going to use his other account User:LAcfm because you had him blocked. And in the middle he said a bunch of Racist shit to me when i was still claming to be you. And he took that... So what should i do? Should i report his other account? Hell if you want proof i'll give you the e-mail and password so you can see the conversation i had with Craxy in my messages. Sean mc Sean 02:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Yea faggot, like you don't like people remove things on your talk page, I don't like you reverting my page! Stop calling people a puppet! LAcfm 02:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Don't worry, I'll be back! It ain't over! LAcfm 03:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

You and Sean will get it coming! I promise! LAcfm 03:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

the password is Pooter1, and the e-mail is Pooter1_Cat@Yahoo.com. Sean mc Sean 03:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

It looks like LAcfm changed the password, but the thing is i took screenshots of the conversation... So i still have proof, i'll send them to you Klptyzm... Sean mc Sean 03:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh, ok. Sean mc Sean 03:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey

I got interested on what Sean Mc Sean was talking about then I heard you had a Myspace! Can I have the link to it I wanna add you!--Manny Ribera 14:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Heres my Url for Myspace so you can add me! http://www.myspace.com/67559330.--Manny Ribera 16:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Cuño answer me meng!--Manny Ribera 15:04, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Eric Sparrow

Hey Klyptzm help me save the Eric Sparrow article! Please I beg of you I wanna save the article from deletion!!!. Please have heart!--Manny Ribera 15:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

It's ok...I just wanted to save the article but now we can't do nothing about it... I do have new stuff about him from Remix but I don't think that will help it...--Manny Ribera 14:21, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

WOW

I saved a article!!!! I just saved the Eric Sparrow Article!!! Man i'm good I should get a reward or somthing! Well anyway i'm proud of myself!--Manny Ribera 14:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks thats gonna make me feel proud...Cuño Idiotez!!!--Manny Ribera 14:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Coño meng It got deleted!!!--Manny Ribera 14:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Don't shadow me around! I was just telling them what it ment and I have the right to so. Please use your tamplets correctly!--Manny Ribera 13:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

And I think you should be nicer!--Manny Ribera 12:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Cookies

Cookies!

Hello! I just wanted to give you a plate of cookies for being a Wikipedian. I hope your Wikistress gets better! :) Peace and Wikilove, Neranei 23:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

lengthy story question

Hello, I am an employee for Universal Republic. I am currently editing information for the Shop Boyz wikipedia page and came across your message. It is imperative to have an indepth biography section for Shop Boyz in order to maintain their explosive image. I would appreciate it if you could inform me how an indepth biography section is a violation. An immediate response would be appreciated. Thank you.

-Universal Republic Staff

The above user and his anon IP counterpart have both been tempblocked for spamming Wikipedia. I am going to usernameblock the registered account tomorrow when the other block expires. Thanks for keeping a sharp eye on the affected articles today! --Fire Star 火星 22:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Shop Boyz

Hello. I noticed that you've recently reverted a user by the name of UniversalRR. While I agree with you that their edits were not neutral, their edits were being done in good faith, and thus not vandalism.

This user has recently written to OTRS. I have explained to his/her the policy of NPOV, and suggested that he or she post to the talk page of the article, outlining the problems with the article. Should he or she actually do so, it would be very helpful if you or someone else could take a look.--§hanel 18:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

They are, in fact, a Universal employee (a PR person). I have explained to them already that they should not edit the article. I know you did try to explain to them, but this person is probably not very familiar with Wikipedia policies and might need a few gentle bops on the head if they still don't get it.--§hanel 20:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

User page "vandalism"

Just to let you know, the IP user who was talking about the rockstar bag on Talk:Grand Theft Auto IV, changed the stress meter on your user page. I would warn him, but he seems to have a dynamic ip, so not much point. John Hayes^talk 09:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

yup it changes from time to time. 202.156.66.110 09:05, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

List of gangs in Grand Theft Auto series

I am reverting. Sorry, but there's a discussion going on the Video games Wikiproject page about this, and we agreed that I could do this. Maybe if you read the relevent talkpages first you'd know not to revert people's edits that have took them several hours of the day. Davnel03 15:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I didn't know their was an AFD for similar edits a year ago (according to the taplkpage it was nominated in February of this year). By the way, what do you mean when you say "crufty" in relation to the article? Davnel03 18:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

So if you're calling my edits fancruft, surely this isn't fancruft (along with all of these articles? Davnel03 19:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

OK, go ahead, revert it, delete the templates, I don't care. Davnel03 21:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Gangs in GTA

Why did you delete all that?It took me ages.

Party Like A Rockstar

I noticed You Had Done Some Editing And Discussion On The Shop Boyz Wikipedia Page. Um I Don't Know How To Change It But The Image For The Album Rockstar Mentality Says Retard Mentality. Thanks For Reading This And If You Get The Time Please Check It Out.

Song in Curtains Down level...

Yeah but I'd still like to know what the song is. Talk about rudeness... TheHeartbreakKid15 14:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

User:Savoie

I have no idea what your dispute is over, but I have blocked Savoie for incivility and racist language. --Dweller 14:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

I have to note, however, that you have also been somewhat incivil. Please do not abuse other users, even if they provoke you. --Dweller 15:01, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Original research and Riddick

This is concerning your 00:03, 11 August 2007 edut and explanation (here's your explanation: ORIIIIIGINAAAAAAAAAAAL RESEEEEEEARRRRRRRCH.

In your edit, you deleted the only paragraph in the whole article that included a footnote and outside reference (although the footnote didn't seem to be working properly for some reason): "In the first movie, Riddick recounts having been abandoned as a baby in a "liquor store trash bin with an umbilical cord wrapped around his neck," but in the second, he is the child of prophecy who mysteriously survives a Massacre of the Innocents on his home planet of Furya.[1]"

By the "original research" logic, it seems like the whole article should go. Where is that fuzzy line that distinguishes non-referenced acceptability and too original?

Cyberwriter

Song Name

Hi, do you know the name of the song in GTA:VC when Tommy gets a private lapdance ? It's Goin' Down 19:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)