User talk:07bargem

Welcome!

Hello, 07bargem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The Dad's Army Appreciation Society, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WuhWuzDat 20:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Dad's Army Appreciation Society

A tag has been placed on The Dad's Army Appreciation Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 20:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the speedy deletion. The subject of the article should be notable enough to support an article. You now need to expand the article as much as you can as there are other methods of article deletion on Wikipedia such as WP:PROD and WP:AFD. Any editor is still free to list the article at either venue. If you really want the article to survive you need to work on it. Any questions give me a shout. Mjroots (talk) 20:49, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good news

Hello 07bargem,

Instead of being deleted, the article The Dad's Army Appreciation Society has been moved into the article incubator. The incubator is a collaborative environment aimed at helping new articles be brought up to Wikipedia's standards in an environment that is free from the pressures of impending deletion. To continue working on your article, please visit Wikipedia:Article Incubator/The Dad's Army Appreciation Society.

If you have any questions or need help, feel free to ask and I will be glad to help. Mjroots (talk) 21:04, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the article had been moved into the incubator, I've added the improved text to the incubator article. I've also deleted the original title and protected it against recreation for now. The reason I've done this is to prevent having two different article being worked on in two different places. The article can be moved back to its original title when it is ready. In the meantime it can be worked on in the incubator. If Dad's Army interests you, there is a WikiProject covering Dad's Army articles which you may be interested in joining - WikiProject Dad's Army. Any questions drop me a line. Mjroots (talk) 21:47, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you working on improving the article. You may want to read WP:CITE. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia we need to state where we got our info from. Websites are referenced with {{cite web}}. It looks a bit daunting but you can generally get away with url, title, publisher and accessdate. If you need any help don't hesitate to drop me a line. Mjroots (talk) 21:17, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dad's Army Appreciation Society

A tag has been placed on Dad's Army Appreciation Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 07:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are being discussed at the Administrator's Noticeboard

Hello, 07bargem. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please feel free to respond to the issue raised there. Mjroots (talk) 09:49, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of my raising the above, the notability of the article has been established and it will remain in mainspace. Please read the ANI report if you have not already done so, and feel free to comment if you wish. The article in the incubator has been deleted. Any questions please ask me, I dont bite! Mjroots (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Dad's Army Appreciation Society. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit and is especially useful when reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 03:00, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Northern Ireland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Stemonitis (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --Mais oui! (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Northern Ireland. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Stemonitis (talk) 15:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be disrupting wikipedia to make a WP:POINT; if you have a valid reason for these edits, then please do take it to the relevant talk page. Should you make 3 reverts in a 24 hour period, you may be blocked without further warning. Thanks Kbthompson (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that, I read recently that Northern Ireland wasn't a country, so thought i would edit the relevant page. 07bargem.

It's perhaps a bit 'controversial'; and changing the status of any part of the UK is best discussed first. You'll find that these have been decided by careful consideration by editors at those specific articles. I think you'll find a discussion of the status of constituent parts of the United Kingdom can be found at that article. Hopefully that will answer any questions you have about the 'special status' of individual parts. HTH Kbthompson (talk) 15:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On talk pages, you can add your signature and timestamp by adding ~~~~ at the end of your message. HTH Kbthompson (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks. 07bargem (talk) 15:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Parliamentary constituencies in Cornwall

Hi, you've left it with a mix of old and new constituencies, e.g. both Truro and St Austell (old) and St Austell and Newquay (new) in the same table. DuncanHill (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was in the process of editing it and accidentely pressed th ewrong buttton. 07bargem (talk) 21:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to make sure you are using the current maps, and I don't think that it's appropriate to use the former district councils (abolished last year) in the ward lists. DuncanHill (talk) 21:05, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected the maps, but I've just noticed that you have used the turnout figures from the election where you should have had the electorate. Please be more careful on articles like these. DuncanHill (talk) 21:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. 07bargem (talk) 14:52, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FAC withdrawn

I appreciate that you are acting in good faith, but it is best if featured articles are nominated by people who have worked closely on them. In this way, they can give reasoned replies to reviewers and be familiar enough with the sources to act on suggested improvements. Someone who has not worked on the article can not provide this input, so the nomination may continue until opposition to it becomes so overwhelming that the article is failed; this takes away time from reviewers. While the Dad's Army article is of reasonable quality, it is not yet of featured quality, and principal contributors must be consulted before a nomination, as required in the featured article candidate instructions. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:13, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parliamentary Constituencies

Hi, I'm not ative everyday, but will help where I can. 95jb14 Talk, Founder of WikiProject Latin. 18:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Cheers 07bargem (talk) 11:36, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Middlesborough > Middlesbrough

Hi, given your sterling work on List of English Electoral Wards by Constituency I hope you will want to know that Middlesbrough is spelt thus, and not -borough. Hope this helps, keep up the good work, and best wishes DBaK (talk) 15:24, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much.

WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms has already been formed

Hello, 07bargem! We are looking for editors to join WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort which aims to create, expand, and maintain articles related to the Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms of England. Thanks!

Please join us at WP:WPASK, and welcome. Sadads (talk) 15:58, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WPASK Assessment Drive

Hey all, our assessment process is raring for moving out, and just needs a little bit of help from you. First and foremost, our Quality and Importance scales need to be completed per consensus, please check them out at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Anglo-Saxon_Kingdoms/Assessment and comment. Next, we have, as of my most recent assessments, 1122 articles that have not been assessed. All I ask is that each and every one of us assess ~10 articles each day you get on Wikipedia to speed up the process and let us really know what we have in our scope. Remember, we have Category, Template, Redirect and Disambiguation classes along with our more traditional stub through FA ratings, please use all of them and look for pages which fall within our scope. Thanks for all the help, Sadads (talk) 22:03, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Electoral Wards

Hi 07bargem. I've listed your "List of Electoral Wards..." articles for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of English Electoral Wards by Constituency. I don't think they're the sort of thing which belongs on Wikipedia. Wereon (talk) 23:34, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I fully respect your opinion, however I feel that they are good reference facilities for people who want to know more. 07bargem (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roald Dahl wikiproject

I have abandoned the project and setteled for a task force which can be found Here. Please join --sillybillypiggy^{talk to me} ^sign! 14:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Leicestershire wiki project

Given your interest for English counties expressed on the Oxfordshire project proposal page would you interested in the proposed project for Leicestershire? Tdoublenineone (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of words for hello

The article List of words for hello has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a translation engine or dictionary. Lists of the same word in different languages belong in dictionaries, not in encyclopedias.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of United Kingdom Political Parties by Ideology

The article United Kingdom Political Parties by Ideology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, unjustified. Clearly WP:OR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 20:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for adminship

Hello 07bargem. Unfortunately, I had to close your RfA per WP:NOTNOW. While I don't wish to discourage you, adminship is not granted lightly and only 4/10 RfAs actually succeed. Keep up the good work though and try again in the future. Good luck, Tom my! 20:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject North America is OFFICIAL!

Hi. Since you indicated an interest at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/North America, I am happy to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject North America has officially been created. As one of the original supporters, you're at the top of the list of people being invited to join. Sven Manguard _Talk 08:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		WikiProject North America Barnstar
		For being a founding member of the project, from the WikiProject council proposal all the way through the project's approval and formation, I award you, my new colleague, this star. Sven Manguard _Talk 03:52, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom Political Parties by Political Position

Hello.

I originally marked this article for deletion as original research, contrary to WP:OR. You removed the notice, stating that the article was not yet ready, and moved it into your user space. Fair enough. But you've moved it back into main space without addressing the OR issues so I've flagged it again. andy (talk) 23:41, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seamus (dog)

Seamus (dog), an article which is part of WikiProject Dogs has been proposed for deletion. Feel free to join the discussion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seamus (dog) (2nd nomination) HHIAdm (talk) 21:18, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Staffordshire

Hi,

I am currently working as Wikipedian in Residence at Staffordshire Archives and Heritage Service. Are you still interested in starting Wikipedia:WikiProject Staffordshire? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:20, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spanish municipal elections, 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toledo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No label listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect No label. Since you had some involvement with the No label redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:38, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 07bargem. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 07bargem. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 07bargem. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 07bargem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 07bargem. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"List of dog breeds recognized by the American Kennel Club" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of dog breeds recognized by the American Kennel Club. Since you had some involvement with the List of dog breeds recognized by the American Kennel Club redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Cavalryman (talk) 08:52, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Small molosser

The article Small molosser has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

DAB page linking to three pages that do not use the term and are not referred to as such.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cavalryman (talk) 09:09, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"List of words for hello" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect List of words for hello and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#List of words for hello until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 17:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Barnsley Independent Group

The article Barnsley Independent Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

General lack of notability. Former local government grouping, no longer appears to exist per council website (https://barnsleymbc.moderngov.co.uk/mgMemberIndex.aspx?FN=PARTY&VW=LIST&PIC=0)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]