User talk:04aeverington

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Bruce Forsyth worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dawn bard (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==

Chrysler me four telve concept

A tag has been placed on Chrysler me four telve concept, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 19:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Team Andrew

A tag has been placed on Team Andrew, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Xdenizen (talk) 20:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Torchwood. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 21:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating joke pages

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Thomas Caullay, you will be blocked from editing. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, 04aeverington, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Also, be sure to read Wikipedia:Notability for tips on what should and should not be included in the Wikipedia. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:Tiddly Tom has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Dadude3320 18:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:DiddyDickAndDomB0088hyh 150 84.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:DiddyDickAndDomB0088hyh 150 84.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:DiddyDickAndDomB0088hyh 150 84.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 19:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Joshua Duckhouse

A tag has been placed on Joshua Duckhouse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Redfarmer (talk) 16:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:EVOLVAScrnsht3.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:EVOLVAScrnsht3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:EVOLVAScrnsht3.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 15:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Pepper spray. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Clockwork Soul 17:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Teflon coated bullet. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Clockwork Soul 17:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing. When you are mature enough to edit constructively, you may request an unblock using the {{unblock}} template. - auburnpilot talk 17:22, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

04aeverington (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will stop vandalising pages.

Decline reason:

Yes, the block has the effect of stopping you from vandalising pages. If you were interested in stopping through your own choice, you had more than enough opportunities to do that, so we've moved on to helping you stop. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"When you are mature enough" does not mean after a day. "When you are mature enough" means three or four years from now, when you are a teenager, and know enough to be able to be useful as an encyclopedia writer. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:11, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]