User talk:0227adina

Philippines Football League

Welcome to Wikipedia and new users are always welcome. However, I'm sorry but the logo is unofficial therefore we can't use it. If you are someone involved in the league and that logo is proposed (not yet officially published), please wait for the logo to be used in reliable published sources such as national newspapers or the official league website when it goes online. If you are a fan who came up with the logo, sorry Wikipedia is not a place for fan works.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 06:04, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Again, While the logo is nice and neat, we can't use them yet, at least assuming these are really the logos proposed to the Philippine Football Federation. If you are connected with the federation don't preempt them. Also if the logo is actually a fan work, sorry no fans works in Wikipedia.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 01:14, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

0227adina, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 0227adina! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:LOGO-CONTEST-WINNER.png

Thanks for uploading File:LOGO-CONTEST-WINNER.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 13:01, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:LOGO-CONTEST-WINNER Copa Paulino Alcantara.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LOGO-CONTEST-WINNER Copa Paulino Alcantara.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LOGO-CONTEST-WINNER Copa Paulino Alcantara.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good day!

I have a contact with Global FC and we talk about the new crest. They will use the logo in their instagram account as official crest of the team for this season and beyond. I will never make a change if there's no permission. As you can observed, they have a different versions of crest to some of their post on their social media accounts because there's no final decisions yet about that. And on February 13, they updated their crest on their facebook account and hours after that they also change their crest in their instagram account with a different crest. The one on instagram is the official logo of the team. I personally contacted them and they confirm that it will be their official crest. Maybe sooner, they will also update their profile facebook photo. They are more active in instagram than on facebook and very soon they will also launch their new twitter and youtube accounts.

Thank you :) 0227adina (talk) 11:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Global FC crest

Hello, I notice that you kept reverting the Global FC crest to the version they are using in their official Instagram account. Please consider how the crest version on the Instagram account might be a stylization of the current crest (absence of borders) and not necessarily the "default" crest. The one on their official Facebook Page seems to be the "default" crest and was used on a white background and is consistent with the previous crests with heavy black borders. Considering the Instagram account has only 360 followers, and the Official Facebook Page has 58 thousand followers, arguments to use the FB version seems stronger.

If Global FC begin to release future PR materials featuring the border-heavy version of the crest. I will promptly revert back the crest. If they begin using the borderless Instagram version in official channels/their kit uniforms beyond as an Instagram profile photo. I will concede and let that version stand. Also the logo will have to be reuploaded here in Wikipedia and not in WikiCommons since Global FC holds copyright over its crest and fair use files are not allowed in Wikicommons. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:09, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]