Jump to content

User talk:...adam.../Archive May 2007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Commons account

[edit]

Why the suffix? ed g2stalk 00:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Davesmith33

[edit]

Don't worry, I'm keeping and eye on him. Gwernol 12:34, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Joke "new message" banner

[edit]

Thank you for your edits but no, thanks--Kamikaze 15:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jolly mean to edit my user page and talk page without no serious reason. I am aware of the policy and it does not "state" such things are prohibited. I have found no consensus regarding this (as the history of my userpage indicates, some user tried too to remove that but was reverted by another editor). Have a nice day. And please refrain from editing my user page as you are not only removing said banner but also other contents.--Kamikaze 16:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you are not writing to break the 3RR by editing from multiple ips.--Kamikaze 16:26, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
One more thing, my user page is not an encyclopedic article. Thousands of user pages, even admin page, have what you call "non-encyclopedic" content.--Kamikaze 16:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly, there is a difference between "is discouraged" or "should not" and "is not allowed" and "must not". Are you able to perceive it?--Kamikaze 16:30, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe you are in error. End of story.--Kamikaze 16:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see your point. Too bad it is not supported by a community

consensus.--Kamikaze 16:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:USER is not actually supporting your point as non-encyclopedic content thing is meant to prevent spamming and advertising. Moreover it is certaninly ambiguous. If you to take it ad litteram, non-encyclopedic content could be considered wikipedian's edits about themselves. And I certainly see no consensus at WT:USER.--Kamikaze 16:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics CotW

[edit]

hey ...adam..., I am writing you to let you know that the Mathematics Collaboration of the week(soon to "of the month") is getting an overhaul of sorts and I would encourage you to participate in whatever way you can, i.e. nominate an article, contribute to an article, or sign up to be part of the project. Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks--Cronholm144 17:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. the collaboration is Theorem right now;)