User talk:-Frank-

Disorder (2009 film)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Disorder (2009 film), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://aafilmfest.org/49/index.php/films/disorder.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 09:24, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Disorderposter.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Disorderposter.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:12, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Love Kill Kill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love Kill Kill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love Kill Kill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoshuSasori (talk) 02:58, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monday (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monday (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monday (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoshuSasori (talk) 03:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Version 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Version 2. Since you had some involvement with the Version 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Tony Hawk

Blsupr (talk) 04:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Be Sure to Share

The article Be Sure to Share has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film with no coverage as to why it should have its own article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]