Jump to content

User talk:-Flyoffacliff-

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Extended content
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

-Flyoffacliff- (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My other account is vanished and I no longer have access to it. You can see that the "flyoffacliff" talk page redirects to "Vanished user qkmnscoinwti8235unckZWlk3", their is no way for me to even use that account because I can't login to it. This is the only account I plan on using from here on out. So please unblock it. Thanks. -Flyoffacliff- (talk) 22:12, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Creating a new account to continue editing does not seem compatible with evoking your right to vanish. Kuru (talk) 22:29, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment for reviewing admin

Please read this and the history of that talk page and its owner's contributions. Favonian (talk) 22:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I recreated the "flyoffacliff" account by mistake by logging into it. Can you please delete it again and then unblock this account? Thanks.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

-Flyoffacliff- (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I changed my mine and decided to come back.

Decline reason:

It is not your choice. As already explained, you muist apply through WP:BASC. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:51, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your block was a result of your disruptive editing, and Beeblebrox told you explicitly that a request for unblocking would have to go through WP:BASC. Favonian (talk) 22:41, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

-Flyoffacliff- (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That is a hassle, why do I need to appeal using that? In response to Favonian's message above: That is Incorrect. This is the order that the events happened from oldest to newest: 1. I created the flyoffacliff account 2. It was blocked for disruptive editing 3. I appealed the block, and I was eventually unblocked. 4. Shortly after, I decided I was done with Wikipedia, and "vanished". 5. After "vanishing", I accidentally logged into the account again, and it un-vanished me. 6. I changed the email address on the account to one I do not have access to, and changed the password to some random 60 character code. I did that so that I would not login by mistake again. 7. I decided to come back to Wikipedia, but since I could no longer login to the old account, I made this one. Reasons I should not be blocked: 1. I am not abusing multiple accounts, because I can no longer login to the old one. This is the only one I plan on using from here on out. 2. I was not blocked at the time I "vanished" on the old account.

Decline reason:

The right to vanish does not permit you to create a new account. Your old one must be re-implemented, and BASC is the only venue. I will be locking access to this talkpage. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:43, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom unblock appeal

[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has carefully considered the user's appeal and has declined to unblock at this time. After six months of not editing Wikipedia under any account including IP accounts the user may again apply to have the block reviewed.

For the Arbitration Committee. SilkTork ✔Tea time 11:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]