User talk:서덕민

서덕민, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi 서덕민! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

Disambiguation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Kikai are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add an entry if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 22:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Anomaly Unisex given names

A tag has been placed on Category:Anomaly Unisex given names requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Ari (name), you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 16:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-cultural name

Please stop adding the category "Cross-cultural name" to name articles. It is not meaningful (literally – the term has no understandable meaning). --bonadea contributions talk 12:28, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Kin-iro Mosaic. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sk8erPrince (talk) 05:46, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arisa (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alisa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Hugtto! PreCure. Sk8erPrince (talk) 13:10, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mari (given name), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop trolling the project with obsolete additions. We don't need them. If you think you could continue editing here whilst ignoring all these warnings you're getting, you're sorely mistaken. Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This wasn’t vandalism. Take it to ANI, if there’s an issue. —AdamF in MO (talk) 02:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to take this case to ANI if this user doesn't drop their WP:IDHT behavior. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 05:11, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You absolutely should, if you think it warrants that. It’s just not vandalism. —AdamF in MO (talk) 17:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I've reported them on ANI. I'm sick and tired of their low quality edits and their IDHT behavior. Enough's enough. Sk8erPrince (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ari (name). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JesseRafe (talk) 19:30, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported on ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Sk8erPrince (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yogoe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Korean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Myrin TV

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Myrin TV requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 13:12, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fire Robo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fire Robo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Thjarkur (talk) 16:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We can't cite other wikis as sources, wikis are user generated content and therefore not reliable. – Thjarkur (talk) 16:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yogoe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yogoe, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PC78 (talk) 22:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fire Robo

A tag has been placed on Fire Robo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 05:26, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Steel Fire Brigade Firebo

A tag has been placed on Steel Fire Brigade Firebo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 05:27, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 09:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

서덕민, please read this

To edit English Wikipedia, it is necessary to be able to write in English well enough to be understood. Perfect English is not needed, but if it is not possible to guess what someone means, there is a real problem. Unfortunately, that is often true about your contributions. The article Mamono (which has now been moved to Draft:Mamono) for instance has a lot of text that is simply impossible to understand. Are you using computer translations? Those can sometimes be helpful for understanding a text, but never for writing a new text. Maybe that is why you are also adding incorrect information sometimes, such as here. Please do not ever use computer translated text in articles. If your English is not strong enough to write in a way that others can understand, it would be better for you to contribute in a Wikipedia version in your native language. All language versions of Wikipedia need more people to work on them.

There are two other very important issues. First, you must start adding sources when you add information to articles. There is more information about that above. Second, please respond to this message to show that you have seen it. You have not ever posted to your user talk page or any other talk pages, and because of that it is hard to know if you are at all aware of the problems. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 10:59, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Agatha (given name).

That names in different languages are similar does NOT mean that they have to be the same name. If you do not have a source that says that two names in different languages are the same, you can not add that information. bonadea contributions talk 14:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh. They've decided to ignore warnings again? I am appalled that they weren't blocked the last time. So much for AGF..... this Korean editor is a lost cause. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:55, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~Don’t worry about it. Nothing in that edit is blockable. It just needs a good source.~~ —AdamF in MO (talk) 17:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can't actually source something that is incorrect, though. The Japanese family name "県" has no relationship with the first name "Agatha", except for a similar pronunciation. --bonadea contributions talk 19:23, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's hilarious how Adam is willing to defend a literal mute on the false assumption that they're editing in good faith. IDHT alone proves that they obviously *cannot* be editing in good faith. It's just so obvious. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 19:34, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What this user needs is a block to get their attention. —AdamF in MO (talk) 20:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, then why wasn't Seo blocked when I reported them on ANI? Because you, and some others tried to argue in their defense that they weren't disrupting the project. Now you're telling me that a block is warranted? Are you kidding me? Can you make up your mind? --Sk8erPrince (talk) 20:21, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

They need a block just to get their attention and bring them to the table. Honest people change as a situation develops. —AdamF in MO (talk) 20:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adamfinmo, with all due respect, despite Seo being warned numerous times, and had an ANI thread that lasted for a week, they had no response. Nothing. Nil. Zero. What makes you think a temporary block is going to change that? --Sk8erPrince (talk) 20:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sk8erPrince - 서덕민 wasn't blocked because you blatantly lied and exaggerated about their edits, with false claims of vandalism and trolling. With your history of [[WP:BITE]ing, sock-puppetry, and unacceptable battle-ground behaviour, you need to simply stick to the facts. It's no wonder that the user is ignoring stuff, when so much incivility has been spread his way. Why not speak politely and welcome new users, instead of posting stark exaggerated warning templates. Your IDHT behaviour on this project is unacceptable! Nfitz (talk) 23:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, why don't you just shut up and stop whiteknighting a literal mute? I've had enough with your bullcrap. *I'm* engaging in IDHT? Are you freaking serious? I usually try to respond as quickly as I could. And what the hell does sockpuppetry even have to do with this case? Are you just spouting textual garbage because you can? How about you stop speaking for Seo and let them speak for themselves?

The fact is, Seo is an incompetent timesink that can't contribute in fluent English to save their life. There. You happy? You also seem to like to ignore the fact that two more editors, Bonadea and Jesse Rafe, respectively, have pointed that they too have issues with Seo's disruptive editing. I am *never* going to welcome an incompetent IDHT timesink that opts to ignore any and all warnings they receive. Good faith is reserved for the competent, not mutes. In my 7 years of editing on Wikipedia, I have *never* seen a registered user that deliberately ignores other people. It's like we don't even exist, and they're just editing in their own little world. They don't seem to recognize the fact that this is a community.

For the last time, stop defending mutes that don't abide by our guidelines. Wake up. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 23:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was defending nothing on this page - I was simply pointing out why they weren't blocked (though the longer they continue similar edits without communicating, then a block does become more likely). Nothing justifies your poor behaviour and blatantly lying about vandalism and trolling, and exaggerating that poor English is "complete nonsense". Please remain WP:CIVIL and always WP:AGF. I'm not sure about the use of "mute" - given it's often used a slur - that's not what you mean here ... but I still ponder the appropriateness of it; can you use more neutral language? Thanks! Nfitz (talk) 00:09, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When I said "mute", I meant *exactly* what I said - quoting the dictionary definition: A person lacking the faculty of speech. Not *once* has Seo tried to communicate. Calling out incompetent users for downgrading the quality of the project is *not* poor behavior. There are no lies. Whiteknights like you need to give it a rest and let the accused speak for themselves. You're not giving them the opportunity to self-defend. What's your problem? Why are you so hellbent in protecting this ESL timesink? What do you gain from doing so?

I will *not* AGF towards mutes. People that don't wanna listen don't deserve the courtesy of AGF. Since it's clear that Seo has been ignoring us for all this time, the only faith that I will be assuming is bad faith. They have shown literally *no* understanding that what they're doing is ruining the project. Go on, tell me that I am wrong. I know I am not. People that refuse to communicate will have their editing privileges taken away.

I am not convinced that a short term block will change this behavior. We could try and implement a short term block, but I am 100% convinced that this behavior will continue unless Seo starts communicating. If not, then an indef block is inevitable, given their unconstructive and IDHT editing history. A few short term blocks would occur first before that happens; it's just a matter of time. Count on it. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 07:05, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know User:Sk8erPrince that they lack vocal chords, and don't have the capacity of speech? You must AGF. Nfitz (talk) 14:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Nfitz:, @Sk8erPrince:, @Adamfinmo:: Please have this conversation anywhere but here. It seems two of you have prior issues with the third of you, and that clouded your assessment of the situation at the ANI. I respectfully ask that all three of you abstain from further conversation about a third party editor on the talk page of User:서덕민. There are serious problems with 서덕민's behavior and we do not need to also discuss anyone else's in this place. I don't mean this to take sides or suggest anyone is doing anything wrong either in their contributions to this user talk or in WP in general, this is just not the place for it and it can only impede any progress on addressing this user's behavior. Thanks! JesseRafe (talk) 15:00, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:JesseRafe I had no prior issue, or communication I can recall, with Sk8erPrince - everything falls out of their false accusations about 서덕민. Though this entire discussion is now moot, given that the announcement that Sk8erPrince has just been banned from Wikipedia for harrassment - see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Sk8erPrince banned. Nfitz (talk)

How much clearer do I have to be? Please contain your comments to 서덕민's edits and behavior, not Ska8erPrince's, on this space. Thank you! JesseRafe (talk) 15:42, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which doesn't preclude me correcting your claim that there was prior issues - there wasn't even prior contact! It's also okay to point out when a user like Sk8erPrince is making false accusations and exaggerations. There's no doubt though, that 서덕민 needs to start adding citations, especially when they create new articles that may be controversial! I don't think anything further need be said here. Nfitz (talk) 15:58, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"seems like" I don't care about your issues with SP, please do not make any more comments on this talk page about anything other than 서덕민's behavior! Unreal... JesseRafe (talk) 16:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I just said that 서덕민 needs to start adding citations. That's the bottom line, and nothing more need be said. Nfitz (talk) 17:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hanna (Korean name) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hanna (Korean name) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanna (Korean name) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JesseRafe (talk) 14:29, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:59, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gag Concert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Kaimono" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kaimono. Since you had some involvement with the Kaimono redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:25, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your behavior is still disruptive, please respond

You just came out of a block and created a page called An-na with no worthwhile content that was effectively deleted by Discospinster. Then, you added wikilinks to non-articles at Viet comics while making those redlinks redirects to the same page, which is something we generally avoid. Then, you added this complete non-sentence at Arisa, a page you've edited frequently and often been undone.

This is problematic because you are making more work for others who want to have a presentable, readable, and well-sourced encyclopedia. This is exacerbated by the fact that you don't write in English very well, and you have not once communicated to others either on a user or article talk page about your edits and why people have to keep undoing them. You just came out of a 72 hour block for adding unsourced information, and, unless you correct your disruptive behavior, it is likely your next block will be longer. I don't doubt your good intentions, but WP:CIR is a rule, as is the need for dialogue when called out for various violations of MOS/OR/Synth, etc. JesseRafe (talk) 14:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ana (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Henri. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

bonadea contributions talk 06:23, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Noa (name). bonadea contributions talk 14:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sakka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Miniforce

Hello 서덕민,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Miniforce for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Utopes (talk) 04:48, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 10:33, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is concerning Miniforce, where the plot summary was copied from an external website. I usually don't block for a single copyright violation, but this editor has made zero user talk edits to date. I've seen this movie many times before, and don't want to have to deal with this 10000 edits and 50 more copyvios later. MER-C 10:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Yogoe concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Yogoe, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Fire Robo concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Fire Robo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yogoe

Hello, 서덕민. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yogoe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fire Robo

Hello, 서덕민. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fire Robo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mamono

Hello, 서덕민. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mamono".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]