User talk:കർണ്ണൻ

Welcome!

Hi, കർണ്ണൻ, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 07:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DRAGON BOOSTER  ★ 07:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

കർണ്ണൻ, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi കർണ്ണൻ! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Setting out of numbers

Please use 3 digits between commas, as per WP:DIGITS, not the South Asian numbering system as is explained at MOS:NUMERAL - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 10:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Religion in Kerala, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. While I appreciate your efforts to improve the article, the grammar errors and changes in meaning of the text do not, in fact, improve the article. —C.Fred (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Kerala. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 19:55, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Kerala, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 20:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Outlander07. I noticed that you recently removed content from Religion in Kerala without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Outlander^07@talk 08:00, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Religion in Kerala‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Outlander^07@talk 09:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Religion in Kerala, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Kerala. - Arjayay (talk) 12:50, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Religion in Kerala shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 12:51, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

<<However, the story of St Thomas coming to India in 52 CE has been contradicted by a recorded archives than some recent political publishers. There was a Thomas who came, but he was a Syrian merchant, Thomas of Cana, and this happened around 500 or 600 CE. In-depth historical research on this topic can be found in the book [32] by a Canadian author and a former Christian monk Ishwar Sharan and research conducted and published by Madras Courier.[33]>>

These lines along with reference provided are of the adamant critique of Christianity Ishwar Sharan who is claimed to be a Hindu monk. If there is anything that violates the existing traditions of Christianity in Kerala it should come from a very secular source. As Ishwar Sharan who belongs to another religion (here a claimed Hindu monk) is a devout critique of Christianity doesn't classify as a secular source, hence it should be deemed as a Right-wing(Hindutva) propaganda tool. Therefore the aforementioned sentence along with its source should be immediately removed from the Wikipedia page "Religion in Kerala". കർണ്ണൻ (talk) 13:53, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring

Please stop removing sourced information, as you have repeatedly done at Religion in Kerala - If you do not think the information is correct, or should not be included for any other reason, please start a discussion at Talk:Religion in Kerala - Do not repeat your deletion - Arjayay (talk) 12:54, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Close June 2020

 Hello, I'm Outlander07. I noticed that you recently removed content from Religion in Kerala without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Outlander07@talk 08:00, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

 Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Religion in Kerala‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Outlander07@talk 09:33, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

 Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Religion in Kerala, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:32, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

 You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Religion in Kerala. - Arjayay (talk) 12:50, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Religion in Kerala shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 12:51, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

<<However, the story of St Thomas coming to India in 52 CE has been contradicted by a recorded archives than some recent political publishers. There was a Thomas who came, but he was a Syrian merchant, Thomas of Cana, and this happened around 500 or 600 CE. In-depth historical research on this topic can be found in the book [32] by a Canadian author and a former Christian monk Ishwar Sharan and research conducted and published by Madras Courier.[33]>>

These lines along with reference provided are of the adamant critique of Christianity Ishwar Sharan who is claimed to be a Hindu monk. If there is anything that violates the existing traditions of Christianity in Kerala it should come from a very secular source. As Ishwar Sharan who belongs to another religion (here a claimed Hindu monk) is a devout critique of Christianity doesn't classify as a secular source, hence it should be deemed as a Right-wing(Hindutva) propaganda tool. Therefore the aforementioned sentence along with its source should be immediately removed from the Wikipedia page "Religion in Kerala". കർണ്ണൻ (talk) 13:58, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see anything that qualifies this edit for any of the exemptions to the three revert rule. Would you like to self-revert and remove the edit, so that you aren't blocked for violating 3RR? —C.Fred (talk) 16:02, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Arjayay (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Religion in Kerala. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Number 5 7 13:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]