User talk:आदर्श

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

आदर्श (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was new thta time so made many mistakes while writing or changing anything in article but now I understand the rules and regulations of wikipedia. So Now, i will not amend any article without any credible source or reference. So I think I should be unblock. आदर्श (talk) 01:44, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

One open unblock request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:09, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

आदर्श (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was new at that time so i didn't knew all the rules but now a i read many rules and regulations. So I think I should be unblock. Now i know that without adding a source or reference, I can not amend any article or paragraph inside the article. आदर्श (talk) 05:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hi. Sorry this has been sitting here a while. Am declining this unblock request because it doesn't really address what you were blocked for. It was not for poor referencing, but because many of your edits show you are unfamiliar with the editing structure. Two examples among many: this one which unnecessarily adds multilingual text in the middle of a paragraph, and this one which shows you are not familiar with WP:NONENGEL. There are other examples, so need to respond directly to these two. There is nothing in your edit history that suggests you are attempting to vandalise, but we cannot allow you to return to editing on en-Wikipedia unless there's a better indication that you have actually read and understood the editing requirements. I agree there are many policies and guidelines, but unfortunately that's the way it is.

As a suggestion, perhaps post on this talkpage a few example edits that you'd like to make to particular pages. These can then be reviewed and suggestions offered if they breach any editing guidelines. If there are a bunch of good edits proposed here that might also convince an administrator that you can be unblocked and have the chance to post those edits directly to articles. Just an idea, but it might help return you to regular editing acivities. -- Euryalus (talk) 01:24, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

आदर्श, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi आदर्श! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello, I'm Gatemansgc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Caste system among South Asian Muslims have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. I've seen that edit summary before, makes it look like some kind of edit assist tool is being used to hide the fact that it's subtle vandalism. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 16:55, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to OpIndia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 11:39, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Social networking service, you may be blocked from editing.

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Dāsānudāsa (talk) 12:25, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for contributing edits that were made in good faith, but have been deemed not to contribute positively to the article. These edits have thus been reverted. Wikipedia's page on unacceptable additions may explain why. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents – the main help page.
Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to create your first article
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out the Teahouse, ask the Help Desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Once again, welcome! BlackcurrantTea (talk) 11:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notices regarding subject areas in which you have edited

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

BlackcurrantTea (talk) 11:40, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

BlackcurrantTea (talk) 11:40, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DanCherek. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Amanatullah Khan—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. DanCherek (talk) 02:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ayurveda. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 12:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Akbaruddin Owaisi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- DaxServer (talk) 11:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can read his Wikipedia page. he gave speech that was against Hinduism and India. आदर्श (talk) 11:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In your edit summary for your edit to the article on the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen, you wrote: "They didn't mention themselves as a representative of Dalits and other Underprivileged communities in India in their website."[1] But the organisation's website (referenced by the citation) says: AIMIM is a political party dedicated to protect and promote the rights of Muslims, Dalits, Adivasis, Other Backward Classes, Other Minorities and all other underprivileged communities in India. So your edit summary was 100% dishonest.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

It is clear that you are here to promote an agenda and have been warned multiple times, writing your personal opinion into edit summaries, articles, adding scripts in violation of established consensus (WP:INDICSCRIPT), using dishonest edit summaries to describe your edits etc. If this continues then your editing privileges will be revoked.—SpacemanSpiff 02:29, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SpacemanSpiff The user doesn't seem to comply Special:Diff/1045151065 — DaxServer (talk to me) 10:11, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 08:27, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

आदर्श (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

मैं तो केवल अंग्रेजी के पृष्ठों को हिन्दी भाषा में अनुवादित करता हूँ। इसीलिये मैं अंग्रेजी के पृष्ठों से सन्दर्भों व स्रोतों का उपयोग करति हूँ। आदर्श (talk) 12:45, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As this is the English Wikipedia, please communicate in English. There is a Hindi Wikipedia if you are more comfortable with that language. 331dot (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am translate English pages into Hindi. So sometimes I use English reference and Source. I don't know why they blocked me on English Wikipedia. आदर्श (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked for being not here to contribute to the encyclopedia. If you are here to contribute, please make another unblock request for someone else to review. 331dot (talk) 15:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61810

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:38, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]