User talk:Nikan Faze

Welcome!

Hello, علی ۲۲, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Third Day (2007 film), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Donaldd23 (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mazanderani Wikipedia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mazanderani Wikipedia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 10:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mazanderani Wikipedia

Hello, علی ۲۲. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mazanderani Wikipedia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cinema of Iran into Pre-revolutionary Iranian cinema. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:29, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit to Piruz Nahavandi clearly copied material from the article on Umar. You have been told before that copying material from one Wikipedia article to another requires attribution.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm Toddy1. Your recent edit(s) to the page Umar appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 20:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Lu'lu'a Firuz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:10, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gilaneh film.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gilaneh film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinitely for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nikan Faze (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the rules. Nikan Faze (talk) 09:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

New request posted below. Do not make new unblock request while the previous one is still pending. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

@Nikan Faze: Please could you tell us what edits you did that you think broke the rules, and how they broke the rules?-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the File:Gilaneh film, I did not know the rules of Wikipedia and inadvertently violated the copyright law. Nikan Faze (talk) 10:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But now I understand and I don't do that anymore. Nikan Faze (talk) 11:23, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nikan Faze (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In the File:Gilaneh film, I did not know the rules of Wikipedia and inadvertently violated the copyright law. But now I understand and I don't do that anymore.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nikan Faze (talk) 12:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did this by mistake and did not intend to sabotage it and I promise to help Wikipedia from now on. Nikan Faze (talk) 14:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I read the copyright law now. Nikan Faze (talk) 15:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand everything and I don't do that again. Nikan Faze (talk) 15:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, explain , in your own words, your understanding of Wikipedia's rules regarding copyrights. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying content without the permission of the copyright holder from a publicly owned or licensed source is likely to be a copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Nikan Faze (talk) 14:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Nikan Faze (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Copying content without the permission of the copyright holder from a publicly owned or licensed source is likely to be a copyright infringement on Wikipedia. I understand.

Accept reason:

Please see the comment below and try to stay out of trouble. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikan Faze (talk) 06:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Do you agree on unblocking? Vanjagenije (talk) 20:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't oppose an unblock. You are welcome to lift it. I don't consider the above answer sufficient, but if Nikan Faze simply avoids uploading any more images and avoids copying content, that'll likely keep them out of trouble. --Yamla (talk) 21:03, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gilaneh (film) has been accepted

Gilaneh (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 16:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Reign of Love

Hello, Nikan Faze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reign of Love, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taraj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taraj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taraj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Htanaungg (talk) 08:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mehdi or Mahdi

I think Mahdi id true especially in Arabic I heard Mehdi have another meaning. M.Nadian (talk) 13:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mehdi is Persian spelling of Mahdi. All Iranian person who name مهدی spelling as Mehdi. Google result for مهدی فخیم‌زاده is also write Mehdi Fakhimzadeh. Nikan Faze (talk) 13:09, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reblocked

You immediately resumed your copyright violations, copying content from themoviedb.org for your article at Taraj. As you have shown a complete unwillingness to abide by WP:COPYRIGHT despite promises that you would stop copying content, this block is indefinite. --Yamla (talk) 13:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked from uploading the file last time. Why am I blocked now? Nikan Faze (talk) 13:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't upload any file. Nikan Faze (talk) 13:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained, literally immediately above your comment, why you were blocked. Which part are you finding difficult to understand? You were previously blocked for violating WP:COPYRIGHT and indicated you clearly understood; were you lying? This was not limited to uploading files. --Yamla (talk) 13:23, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me exactly where Taraj's article had a problem? Nikan Faze (talk) 13:37, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You copied the synopsis either from imdb or from themoviedb.org (the same synopsis appears on both sites). I can't repeat the exact content, obviously, but surely you know you copied the content? There's simply zero chance you came up with the exact same synopsis yourself. Seriously, what's the problem here? --Yamla (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I copied the Synopsis from Letterboxed:

https://letterboxd.com/film/invasion-1985/

And it was in the sources! It was one of the four or five sources I had included for the introduction. When you go to the article References section, you will see it! I did not know I had to mention this twice. I think tha's my fals that i don't mention it twice. Sorry. Nikan Faze (talk) 13:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is inappropriate and a violation of WP:COPYRIGHT. Simply placing a site in an article's references section does not mean you are free to copy and paste content from that site. --Yamla (talk) 13:55, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Im persian. I read the Persian version of this article (WP:Copyright) and did not give a full explanation about it in the Persian article. I had to translate the English version. I'm sorry. Nikan Faze (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should stick to editing the Persian version of Wikipedia. You've repeatedly demonstrated you lack the ability to understand the English language policies and guidelines, and you've repeatedly placed the entire project in jeopardy. --Yamla (talk) 13:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are right. But please remove me from the block because many times I have to get help from the English Wikipedia to edit the Persian Wikipedia. For example, copy the infobox of an English article and then copy to persian article and then translate it into Persian . But if I am a block, I can not do this. Instead, I promise to almost zero my contributions to English Wikipedia. Nikan Faze (talk) 14:08, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not willing to do this. --Yamla (talk) 14:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But I just destroyed my article by mistake and did not make a big mess. Nikan Faze (talk) 14:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You made a significant mess by violating copyright and I had to clean up your mess. I am not willing to unblock you. WP:GAB explains how you can have another admin review your block. I'll warn you, though, it's unlikely anyone will lift this block given your history of ignoring warnings, making promises, and then immediately violating those promises. --Yamla (talk) 14:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You say as if this violation has happened 10 times. But this violation happened only twice and the first reason was my ignorance and the second reason was the incompleteness of the copyright article in Persian Wikipedia. Nikan Faze (talk) 14:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is simply not the case that you violated copyright only twice. On this talk page, you can see two warnings, followed by a block, followed by another block. That's at least four times. And that's only the times noted on this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 15:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nikan Faze (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I violated the copyright twice. For the first time, I did not know about the exact rules of Wikipedia, and I apologized for that. I went to the copyright article on Persian Wikipedia (because it is my mother tongue) and read it and realized. But this article in Persian Wikipedia is not a completely like English article. The Persian article did not say that if I copied an thing in two parts of the article, I should use the same source for both of them. In my article, I copied two parts from one site. I put the source for the first time. With the second, I did not put a source, thinking that the source is in the References section of the article and its in of and i don't must to mention one source two times. And I was blocked for this crime! Please help me.

Decline reason:

You were previously unblocked on the basis that you wouldn't breach copyright, and then you immediately resumed breaching copyright. Please do not post further unblock appeals until you can comprehensively demonstrate your competence with en-Wikipedia's policies. -- Euryalus (talk) 11:49, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:List of Shahbanus of Persia

Hello, Nikan Faze. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Shahbanus of Persia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Khatoon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Khatoon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Khatoon.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Khatoon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]