User talk:על הטוב
Welcome!
|
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]Hello! על הטוב,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 21:31, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
|
September 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Hayman30. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ronen Mally— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hayman30 (talk) 14:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ronen Mally. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 14:03, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Deletion pending for File:Hod moshonov - BEMET.jpg
[edit]Hello, על הטוב. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Hod moshonov - BEMET.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.
- If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.
- If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.
If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:44, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
David Leybel moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, David Leybel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 10:48, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Given that I am aware of its broader context, I would assert that there was no disingenuous motive on my part to draftify that article. I stand by that decision. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Shirt58 I did not quite understand what missing in the article in order to move it to article namespace. על הטוב (talk) 05:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi על הטוב. You can move it back into articlespace if you wish.
- To be blunt, with About 149 results in latin script, the subject of article would appear to fail to meet any number of tests for notability, including but not limited to WP:ANYBIO, WP:AUTHOR and so on.
I've used up my non-paywalled views on The Jerusalem Post- no, cancel that Rabbi Leybel is mentioned there, but only in the context of Avratec and/or RavTech, articles that as an administrator on the English language Wikipedia I can see have never been created. - I do note that in this draft the first reference "[רב דוד ליבל, AvraTech - Wise Tech Academy https://www.avratech.org.il/rabi-david-charles-leybel/] incudes at the bottom of its page "©All Rights Reserved 2018 Created by Ravtech"
- Should you chose to move this article back into articlespace, please be aware that it may well be tagged for speedy deletion, quite possibly under the WP:A7 and WP:G11 criteria.
- Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:45, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
- Shirt58 I did not quite understand what missing in the article in order to move it to article namespace. על הטוב (talk) 05:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
David Leybel moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, David Leybel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MrsSnoozyTurtle 23:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: David Leybel (March 28)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Leybel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Leybel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Concern regarding Draft:David Leybel
[edit]Hello, על הטוב. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Leybel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:David Leybel
[edit]Hello, על הטוב. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "David Leybel".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, על הטוב. Thank you for your work on Baruch Weisbecker. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good start. Really needs another source that covers him in depth. Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 20:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Beit Matityau Yeshiva for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beit Matityau Yeshiva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.