User talk:טוקיוני

When I saw the graph, my thought immediately was that it is really dumb to have the hottest curve, with the highest frequency photons, be colored red. How could anyone do that? The hottest curve should obviously be light blue. Red should be next to black.

excuse me, but what graph are you talking about? טוקיוני (talk) 20:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! In this page about dissection, the following dissection has not been founded by Lindgren but by H.Perigal. Ref. Frederickson books + Wolfram Alpha's web site. It's really very difficult for me to edit Hebrew... Could you please make the correction? Thanks, Blanvill (talk) 06:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Done! Thanks for the correction. It's nice to see someone notices this page I wrote a long time ago! טוקיוני (talk) 21:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reactivity! Blanvill (talk) 05:49, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear טוקיוני, I've uploaded H. Perigal Geometric Dissection and Transpositions publication on wikisource, and I added it in the references list of your article. They are very nice dissections inside that could interest you. Best regards, Blanvill (talk) 13:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

That's incredible! thank you very much for notifying me! 18:38, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emotions Analytics

The article Emotions Analytics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The term is a neologism, a creation of one software company as near as can be seen. None of the sources here even have it in their title. The article stands as an WP:OR research paper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 06:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Brianhe, thank you for notifying me! This article was written by a freind of mine and I only helped editing it to match the Wiki style. I do not know whether it matches the criteria of wikipedia as this is not my area of expertise. But I have alerted her and I leave it to her to take car of it. yours gratefully, טוקיוני (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, טוקיוני. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Aviad Frydman, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 11:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aviad Frydman

The article Aviad Frydman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NPROF. This is a very high citation field, and while Dr. Frydman's total citation count is respectable, most of those are for papers on which he is pretty far down the author list. If there are sources in the Israeli WP that directly establish notability, they should be added here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PianoDan (talk) 16:16, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PianoDan The critique here doesn't make sense. Prof. Frydman is the contributing author on all the highly cited papers quoted in the paper. In academia the convention is that the first author of a paper is the student in charge of the project, and the last author is the group leader who initated the project and in whose lab the work was performed. Thus being last on the author list means he is the most important person on the author list. טוקיוני (talk) 05:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]